From: Orit Wasserman <owasserm@redhat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, aliguori@us.ibm.com, mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
quintela@redhat.com, armbru@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
lcapitulino@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, akong@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 3/3] Fix address handling in inet_nonblocking_connect
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 13:00:44 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <505AE94C.8090702@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120920093714.GB10884@redhat.com>
On 09/20/2012 12:37 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 11:57:37AM +0300, Orit Wasserman wrote:
>> On 09/20/2012 09:03 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>>> @@ -526,16 +592,19 @@ int inet_connect(const char *str, Error **errp)
>>>> return sock;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> -
>>>> -int inet_nonblocking_connect(const char *str, bool *in_progress,
>>>> - Error **errp)
>>>> +int inet_nonblocking_connect(const char *str, ConnectHandler *callback,
>>>> + void *opaque, bool *in_progress, Error **errp)
>>>> {
>>>
>>> Would be nice to have some documentation here.
>>> Something like "on immediate success or immediate
>>> failure, in_progress is set to false, in that case
>>> callback is not invoked".
>> of course.
>>>
>>> If you look at it this way, this API is hard to
>>> use right. I'd like to suggest we get rid of
>>> in_progress flag: return -1 on error and
>>> return >=0 and invoke callback on immediate success.
>>>
>> we can even take it further and always invoke the callback
>> (even for immediate error), this way the user of the function
>> can put all the error/success handling in the callback function.
>>
>> Orit
>
> Yes but I don't think this is a good idea:
> there's value in reporting immediate error
> directly to the user when command was invoked,
> this is more user-friendly.
> Not so for immediate success since that is
> only a step in the migration process.
>
>
OK
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-20 10:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-13 18:58 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/3] nonblocking connect address handling cleanup Orit Wasserman
2012-09-13 18:58 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/3] Refactor inet_connect_opts function Orit Wasserman
2012-09-14 8:58 ` Juan Quintela
2012-09-19 8:33 ` Amos Kong
2012-09-20 2:33 ` Amos Kong
2012-09-20 11:22 ` Orit Wasserman
2012-09-20 12:38 ` Markus Armbruster
2012-09-20 11:21 ` Orit Wasserman
2012-09-13 18:58 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 2/3] Separate inet_connect into inet_connect (blocking) and inet_nonblocking_connect Orit Wasserman
2012-09-14 9:07 ` Juan Quintela
2012-09-20 12:44 ` Markus Armbruster
2012-09-20 14:56 ` Orit Wasserman
2012-09-13 18:58 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 3/3] Fix address handling in inet_nonblocking_connect Orit Wasserman
2012-09-14 9:17 ` Juan Quintela
2012-09-19 8:31 ` Amos Kong
2012-09-20 11:20 ` Orit Wasserman
2012-09-20 15:16 ` Amos Kong
2012-09-23 6:34 ` Orit Wasserman
2012-09-24 9:48 ` Amos Kong
2012-09-24 10:40 ` Orit Wasserman
2012-09-24 11:41 ` Amos Kong
2012-09-20 6:03 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-09-20 8:57 ` Orit Wasserman
2012-09-20 9:37 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-09-20 10:00 ` Orit Wasserman [this message]
2012-09-20 13:14 ` Markus Armbruster
2012-09-20 14:53 ` Orit Wasserman
2012-09-21 8:03 ` Markus Armbruster
2012-09-23 7:31 ` Orit Wasserman
2012-09-20 13:19 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/3] nonblocking connect address handling cleanup Markus Armbruster
2012-09-20 14:55 ` Orit Wasserman
2012-09-20 15:12 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-09-20 15:19 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-09-20 15:15 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-09-21 8:03 ` Markus Armbruster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=505AE94C.8090702@redhat.com \
--to=owasserm@redhat.com \
--cc=akong@redhat.com \
--cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
--cc=mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).