From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:43150)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kraxel@redhat.com>) id 1TEifd-0006By-6P
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 11:28:09 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kraxel@redhat.com>) id 1TEifT-0006x3-PD
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 11:28:05 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:48652)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kraxel@redhat.com>) id 1TEifT-0006wy-Gr
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 11:27:55 -0400
Message-ID: <505B35F6.8060302@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 17:27:50 +0200
From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1348053341-29212-1-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com>
	<1348053341-29212-8-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com>
	<alpine.DEB.2.02.1209191429510.29232@kaball.uk.xensource.com>
	<505AB4C9.9070809@redhat.com>
	<alpine.DEB.2.02.1209201218480.29232@kaball.uk.xensource.com>
	<505B1F46.1080303@redhat.com>
	<alpine.DEB.2.02.1209201611170.29232@kaball.uk.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1209201611170.29232@kaball.uk.xensource.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 7/9] fbdev: move to pixman
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>

  Hi,

>> In any graphics mode relevant today vga emulation will use
>> qemu_create_displaysurface_from().  Whenever a DisplayAllocator is
>> present or not doesn't make any difference then.
> 
> Unfortunately if my memory doesn't fail me, Windows uses 24 bpp.
> So actually the DisplayAllocator interface is the one that is going to be
> used all the time.

Guess we want implement 24bpp support in displaylisteners then.

cheers,
  Gerd