From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:37991) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TF1II-0007A0-FO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 07:21:15 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TF1IG-0005O5-U0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 07:21:14 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:19246) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TF1IG-0005Nu-Ld for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 07:21:12 -0400 Message-ID: <505C4DA3.8020009@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 13:21:07 +0200 From: Kevin Wolf MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1348174859-24809-1-git-send-email-otubo@linux.vnet.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <1348174859-24809-1-git-send-email-otubo@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] New syscalls to the seccomp whitelist List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Eduardo Otubo Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Am 20.09.2012 23:00, schrieb Eduardo Otubo: > Seccomp syscall whitelist updated after tests running qemu under > libvirt. Reference to the bug - > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855162 > > Regards, > --- > qemu-seccomp.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) SoB is missing. Kevin