From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: ching <lsching17@gmail.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] linux aio and cache mode
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 15:33:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5061B2AB.8050509@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5060E147.3080306@gmail.com>
Am 25.09.2012 00:40, schrieb ching:
> On 09/24/2012 08:30 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> Am 24.09.2012 13:32, schrieb ching:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> My host is qemu-1.1.1 and x64 kernel 3.5.4. The guest is using aio="native"
>>>
>>> I am trying to use unsafe cache mode to boost i/o performance.
>> aio=native requires the image to be opened with O_DIRECT, i.e.
>> cache=none or cache=directsync. If you specify a different cache option,
>> it will silently fall back to aio=threads.
>>
>> Kevin
>>
>
> will qemu log a entry for the silent fallback?
No, that's why it's silent. :-)
> Reason:
>
> I am testing sparse image on btrfs with mount option: rw,noatime,space_cache,autodefrag,inode_cache
>
> i encounter a speed difference (around 2X-3X) between aio=threads,cache=unsafe and aio=native,cache=unsafe
>
> aio=threads is much faster, i guest there is conflict between "autodefrag" and linux aio
This is odd. The point is that with cache=unsafe it shouldn't even be
using Linux AIO in the first place. I can't see why there would be any
difference between aio=threads and aio=native with cache=unsafe.
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-25 13:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-24 11:32 [Qemu-devel] linux aio and cache mode ching
2012-09-24 12:30 ` Kevin Wolf
2012-09-24 22:40 ` ching
2012-09-25 13:33 ` Kevin Wolf [this message]
2012-09-25 23:22 ` ching
2012-09-26 7:51 ` Kevin Wolf
2012-09-28 0:00 ` ching
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5061B2AB.8050509@redhat.com \
--to=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=lsching17@gmail.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).