From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: Peter Lieven <pl@dlhnet.de>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Block Migration Assertion in qemu-kvm 1.2.0
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 16:00:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5061B8E5.7070000@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50595CFE.7050208@dlhnet.de>
Am 19.09.2012 07:49, schrieb Peter Lieven:
> On 09/18/12 12:31, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> Am 18.09.2012 12:28, schrieb Peter Lieven:
>>> On 09/17/12 22:12, Peter Lieven wrote:
>>>> On 09/17/12 10:41, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>>>>> Am 16.09.2012 12:13, schrieb Peter Lieven:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> when trying to block migrate a VM from one node to another, the source
>>>>>> VM crashed with the following assertion:
>>>>>> block.c:3829: bdrv_set_in_use: Assertion `bs->in_use != in_use' failed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is this sth already addresses/known?
>>>>> Not that I'm aware of, at least.
>>>>>
>>>>> Block migration doesn't seem to check whether the device is already in
>>>>> use, maybe this is the problem. Not sure why it would be in use, though,
>>>>> and in my quick test it didn't crash.
>>>>>
>>>>> So we need some more information: What's you command line, did you do
>>>>> anything specific in the monitor with block devices, what does the
>>>>> stacktrace look like, etc.?
>>>> kevin, it seems that i can very easily force a crash if I cancel a
>>>> running block migration.
>>> if I understand correctly what happens there are aio callbacks coming in
>>> after
>>> blk_mig_cleanup() has been called.
>>>
>>> what is the proper way to detect this in blk_mig_read_cb()?
>> You could try this, it doesn't detect the situation in
>> blk_mig_read_cb(), but ensures that all callbacks happen before we do
>> the actual cleanup (completely untested):
> after testing it for half an hour i can say, it seems to fix the problem.
> no segfaults and also no other assertions.
>
> while searching I have seen that the queses blk_list and bmds_list are
> initialized at
> qemu startup. wouldn't it be better to initialize them at init_blk_migration
> or at least check that they are really empty? i have also seen that
> prev_time_offset
> is not initialized.
Probably. If you sent this as a proper patch with a SoB, I wouldn't
reject it, but considering that block migration is deprecated anyway, I
won't bother myself as long as there's no real bug.
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-25 14:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-16 10:13 [Qemu-devel] Block Migration Assertion in qemu-kvm 1.2.0 Peter Lieven
2012-09-17 8:41 ` Kevin Wolf
2012-09-17 14:35 ` Peter Lieven
2012-09-17 20:12 ` Peter Lieven
2012-09-18 10:28 ` Peter Lieven
2012-09-18 10:31 ` Kevin Wolf
2012-09-19 5:49 ` Peter Lieven
2012-09-25 14:00 ` Kevin Wolf [this message]
2012-09-17 20:20 ` Peter Lieven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5061B8E5.7070000@redhat.com \
--to=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=pl@dlhnet.de \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).