Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] Add infrastructure for QIDL-based device serialization

[Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>]

Il 26/09/2012 12:20, Kevin Wolf ha scritto:
>>> >>     QIDL_DECLARE(RTCState) {                                                                            
>>> >>         ISADevice dev qidl(immutable);
>>> >>         MemoryRegion io qidl(immutable);
>> > 
>> > Just like sparse is a "compiler", so is qidl.  We are free to use the
>> > '_' + lowercase prefix.
>> > 
>> >           ISADevice _immutable dev;
>> > 
>> > It's an established practice in wide-use.
> Not commenting on the underscore, but you did one thing that I want to
> support: Put the (q)_immutable in a place where it looks like a
> qualifier. Not so important for the qidl(...) syntax, but with the
> simplified forms I definitely like it better.
> 
> I think I would even have made it '(q)_immutable ISADevice dev;', but
> having the field name last is what really matters for readability.

Agreed.  I don't want to be a nuisance, so: Michael, please pick one between

    ISADevice QIDL(immutable) dev
    ISADevice q_immutable dev
    ISADevice qidl(immutable) dev

and if you choose the second, let's make QIDL an implementation detail,
i.e. document that every new attribute we introduce should define a new
q_* macro.

Paolo