From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:60702) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TGsUT-0003bE-ON for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 10:21:37 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TGsUO-0005Q7-15 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 10:21:29 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:12738) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TGsUN-0005Q0-Or for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 10:21:23 -0400 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q8QELNeA006070 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 10:21:23 -0400 Message-ID: <50630F61.60901@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 10:21:21 -0400 From: Jeff Cody MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <0a92f2462c53f5da2c4038c6c5cbf2000b3ef14c.1348589526.git.jcody@redhat.com> <50630F39.5020606@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <50630F39.5020606@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 7/7] block: after creating a live snapshot, make old image read-only Reply-To: jcody@redhat.com List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Kevin Wolf Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, eblake@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 09/26/2012 10:20 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote: > Am 25.09.2012 18:29, schrieb Jeff Cody: >> Currently, after a live snapshot of a drive, the image that has >> been 'demoted' to be below the new active layer remains r/w. >> This patch reopens it read-only. >> >> Note that we do not check for error on the reopen(), because we >> will not abort the snapshots if the reopen fails. >> >> This patch depends on the bdrv_reopen() series. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jeff Cody > > This should be independent from the live commit patches, so I already > applied this one to the block branch. > > Kevin > Thanks