From: Cole Robinson <crobinso@redhat.com>
To: Eduardo Otubo <otubo@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] New syscalls to the seccomp whitelist
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 12:55:34 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50633386.9020903@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1348231233-29841-1-git-send-email-otubo@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On 09/21/2012 08:40 AM, Eduardo Otubo wrote:
> Seccomp syscall whitelist updated after tests running qemu under
> libvirt. Reference to the bug -
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855162
>
> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Otubo <otubo@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> qemu-seccomp.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/qemu-seccomp.c b/qemu-seccomp.c
> index 64329a3..4712338 100644
> --- a/qemu-seccomp.c
> +++ b/qemu-seccomp.c
> @@ -70,6 +70,7 @@ static const struct QemuSeccompSyscall seccomp_whitelist[] = {
> { SCMP_SYS(setsockopt), 245},
> { SCMP_SYS(uname), 245},
> { SCMP_SYS(semget), 245},
> + { SCMP_SYS(accept4), 241 },
> #endif
> { SCMP_SYS(eventfd2), 245 },
> { SCMP_SYS(dup), 245 },
> @@ -107,7 +108,25 @@ static const struct QemuSeccompSyscall seccomp_whitelist[] = {
> { SCMP_SYS(getsockname), 242 },
> { SCMP_SYS(getpeername), 242 },
> { SCMP_SYS(fdatasync), 242 },
> - { SCMP_SYS(close), 242 }
> + { SCMP_SYS(close), 242 },
> + { SCMP_SYS(unlink), 241 },
> + { SCMP_SYS(statfs), 241 },
> + { SCMP_SYS(getuid), 241 },
> + { SCMP_SYS(ftruncate), 241 },
> + { SCMP_SYS(getegid), 241 },
> + { SCMP_SYS(geteuid), 241 },
> + { SCMP_SYS(getgid), 241 },
> + { SCMP_SYS(getrlimit), 241 },
> + { SCMP_SYS(set_tid_address), 241 },
> + { SCMP_SYS(socketpair), 241 },
> + { SCMP_SYS(fstatfs), 241 },
> + { SCMP_SYS(epoll_create), 241 },
> + { SCMP_SYS(epoll_ctl), 241 },
> + { SCMP_SYS(epoll_wait), 241 },
> + { SCMP_SYS(pipe), 241 },
> + { SCMP_SYS(poll), 241 },
> + { SCMP_SYS(rt_sigpending), 241 },
> + { SCMP_SYS(rt_sigtimedwait), 241 },
> };
>
> int seccomp_start(void)
>
If this is required for libvirt + seccomp, might be a candidate for 1.2
stable, cc'ing. At the very least we will be carrying this in Fedora 18.
- Cole
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-26 16:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-20 21:00 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] New syscalls to the seccomp whitelist Eduardo Otubo
2012-09-21 11:21 ` Kevin Wolf
2012-09-21 12:40 ` Eduardo Otubo
2012-09-24 12:36 ` Eduardo Otubo
2012-09-26 16:55 ` Cole Robinson [this message]
2012-09-26 20:10 ` Paul Moore
2012-09-26 15:14 ` Paul Moore
2012-09-26 16:24 ` Eduardo Otubo
2012-09-26 16:42 ` Paul Moore
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50633386.9020903@redhat.com \
--to=crobinso@redhat.com \
--cc=otubo@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-stable@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).