From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] versatile: Push lsi initialization to the end
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2012 17:18:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5072EEB7.2070408@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5072782E.9090707@siemens.com>
Il 08/10/2012 08:52, Jan Kiszka ha scritto:
> On 2012-10-06 04:13, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 5 October 2012 19:01, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com> wrote:
>>> I'm not a fan of this either, but the alternatives are way more
>>> complicated. We either need to rewrite the chardev subsystem,
>>> specifically how mux'ed devices are registered and how the active one is
>>> selected. Or we need to avoid flushing "unrelated" BHs for block
>>> devices. Not sure of those read requests can be postponed.
>>
>> Is this a regression? If it is then the obvious answer is to back
>> out whatever broke it...
>
> I'm using this machine for the first time, so I cannot answer this from
> the top of my head. However, I don't think it can be a regression.
>
> Mux chardevs work like this: You create the backend, then you register
> the frontend with them, one by one. The last one registered is the first
> one active. It should also receive the open event of chardev. But as
> that open even is issued via a BH and last frontend, the serial device,
> arrives after the first BH flushing, things break.
Does something like this work instead?
diff --git a/qemu-char.c b/qemu-char.c
index b082bae..1ed6d49 100644
--- a/qemu-char.c
+++ b/qemu-char.c
@@ -465,6 +465,9 @@ static void
mux_chr_update_read_handler(CharDriverState *chr)
d->focus = d->mux_cnt;
d->mux_cnt++;
mux_chr_send_event(d, d->focus, CHR_EVENT_MUX_IN);
+ if (chr->opened) {
+ mux_chr_send_event(d, d->focus, CHR_EVENT_OPENED);
+ }
}
static CharDriverState *qemu_chr_open_mux(CharDriverState *drv)
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-08 15:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-05 17:30 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] versatile: Push lsi initialization to the end Jan Kiszka
2012-10-05 17:42 ` Peter Maydell
2012-10-05 18:01 ` Jan Kiszka
2012-10-06 2:13 ` Peter Maydell
2012-10-08 6:52 ` Jan Kiszka
2012-10-08 15:18 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2012-10-08 15:28 ` Jan Kiszka
2012-10-08 16:02 ` Peter Maydell
2012-10-08 16:28 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-10-08 16:46 ` Jan Kiszka
2012-10-08 17:07 ` Aurelien Jarno
2012-10-08 17:09 ` Jan Kiszka
2012-10-08 16:33 ` Peter Maydell
2012-10-08 16:39 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5072EEB7.2070408@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).