From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:55108) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TNLO6-000845-9y for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 14 Oct 2012 06:25:39 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TNLO5-0008Cb-Bd for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 14 Oct 2012 06:25:38 -0400 Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua ([212.40.38.140]:2557) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TNLO5-00080w-0M for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 14 Oct 2012 06:25:37 -0400 Message-ID: <507A9311.4020004@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2012 13:25:21 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <50720C75.30109@FreeBSD.org> <5072968C.60000@FreeBSD.org> <5075E2B6.9060603@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] bug in popcnt emulation with some register operand(s)? List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: malc Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org on 11/10/2012 00:09 malc said the following: > On Thu, 11 Oct 2012, Andriy Gapon wrote: > >> on 08/10/2012 12:02 Andriy Gapon said the following: >>> on 08/10/2012 10:52 malc said the following: >>>> On Mon, 8 Oct 2012, Andriy Gapon wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> I am running Qemu (plain, no kvm, etc) on an AMD 10h machine that >>>>> provides popcnt instruction. Qemu advertises availability of pocnt >>>>> to a guest as well. What I see in the guest that popcnt >>>>> 0x20(%r12),%r8 instruction actually placed its result into %rax. >>>>> With %rdi and %rax operands the instruction worked fine though. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> Does following work? >>> >>> It does! Thank you very much. >> >> Do you plan to commit this fix? >> Is there anything that I should do to make that happen (sooner)? >> > > Submit a patch with a well thought out comment and it'll be commited. > > [..snip..] > Hmm... Since you are the author of the patch, wouldn't be more appropriate for you to submit it? Besides, I can only mostly repeat the bug report as I do not quite understand the code and can not properly describe what the patch does. Sorry for not taking up the work, but I am really just a qemu user. -- Andriy Gapon