From: "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
To: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Cc: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 02/13] qdev: split up header so it can be used in cpu.h
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 02:01:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <507CA3CB.3050705@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1349378133-25644-3-git-send-email-ehabkost@redhat.com>
Am 04.10.2012 21:15, schrieb Eduardo Habkost:
> From: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
>
> Header file dependency is a frickin' nightmare right now. cpu.h tends to get
> included in our 'include everything' header files but qdev also needs to include
> those headers mainly for qdev-properties since it knows about CharDriverState
> and friends.
>
> We can solve this for now by splitting out qdev.h along the same lines that we
> previously split the C file. Then cpu.h just needs to include qdev-core.h
>
> [ehabkost: re-add DEFINE_PROP_PCI_HOST_DEVADDR, that was removed on the
> original patch (by mistake, I guess)]
> [ehabkost: kill qdev_prop_set_vlan() declaration]
>
> Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Generally I am still in favor of doing such a per-topic file split, in
whatever way exactly we proceed with CPU-as-a-device.
If this is supposed to go through my CPU queue then I would prefer to
move the [ehabkost: ...] lines chronologically between the Sobs fwiw.
What I would insist on is mentioning both new file names in the commit
message (qdev-core.h and qdev-properties.h iiuc) since the +++ stats are
ambiguous.
I spotted the following textual discrepancy:
> diff --git a/hw/qdev-core.h b/hw/qdev-core.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..ca205fc
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/hw/qdev-core.h
[...]
> +/*
> + * This callback is used to create Open Firmware device path in accordance with
> + * OF spec http://forthworks.com/standards/of1275.pdf. Indicidual bus bindings
> + * can be found here http://playground.sun.com/1275/bindings/.
> + */
[...]
> diff --git a/hw/qdev.h b/hw/qdev.h
> index d699194..365b8d6 100644
> --- a/hw/qdev.h
> +++ b/hw/qdev.h
[...]
> - /*
> - * This callback is used to create Open Firmware device path in accordance
> - * with OF spec http://forthworks.com/standards/of1275.pdf. Individual bus
> - * bindings can be found at http://playground.sun.com/1275/bindings/.
> - */
[snip]
"Individual" became "Indicidual" and the comment seems misplaced, which
makes myself ask whether this split was not done safely via copy&paste?
Regards,
Andreas
--
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-16 0:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-04 19:15 [Qemu-devel] [RFC v2 00/13] include qdev core in *-user, make CPU child of DeviceState Eduardo Habkost
2012-10-04 19:15 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC 01/13] qdev: kill bogus comment Eduardo Habkost
2012-10-05 13:49 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-trivial] " Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-10-04 19:15 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC 02/13] qdev: split up header so it can be used in cpu.h Eduardo Habkost
2012-10-16 0:01 ` Andreas Färber [this message]
2012-10-04 19:15 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC 03/13] qapi-types.h doesn't really need to include qemu-common.h Eduardo Habkost
2012-10-04 19:15 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC 04/13] qdev: separate core from the code used only by qemu-system-* Eduardo Habkost
2012-10-04 19:15 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC 05/13] qdev: rename qdev.c to qdev-core.c Eduardo Habkost
2012-10-04 19:15 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC 06/13] qdev-core: isolate vmstate handling into separate functions Eduardo Habkost
2012-10-04 19:15 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC 07/13] qdev: move vmstate handling to qdev-system.c Eduardo Habkost
2012-10-04 19:15 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC 08/13] qdev-core: isolate reset register/unregister code Eduardo Habkost
2012-10-04 19:15 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC 09/13] qdev: move reset register/unregister code to qdev-system.c Eduardo Habkost
2012-10-16 14:13 ` Anthony Liguori
2012-10-04 19:15 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC 10/13] move qemu_irq typedef out of cpu-common.h Eduardo Habkost
2012-10-04 20:20 ` Peter Maydell
2012-10-04 19:15 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC 11/13] qdev: use full qdev.h include path on qdev*.c Eduardo Habkost
2012-10-04 19:15 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC 12/13] include core qdev code into *-user, too Eduardo Habkost
2012-10-04 19:15 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC 13/13] make CPU a child of DeviceState Eduardo Habkost
2012-10-09 14:43 ` Peter Crosthwaite
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=507CA3CB.3050705@suse.de \
--to=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).