From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:40401) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TOQDE-0007M3-6c for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Oct 2012 05:46:57 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TOQD8-0007hn-7s for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Oct 2012 05:46:52 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:49271) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TOQD8-0007hA-07 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Oct 2012 05:46:46 -0400 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q9H9kikH015246 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 17 Oct 2012 05:46:44 -0400 Message-ID: <507E7E81.4070802@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 11:46:41 +0200 From: Kevin Wolf MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <507DC47E.9050505@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <507DC47E.9050505@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/4] block-commit fixes List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Eric Blake Cc: Jeff Cody , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Am 16.10.2012 22:33, schrieb Eric Blake: > On 10/16/2012 01:49 PM, Jeff Cody wrote: >> v2 -> v3 differences: >> >> * Simplified code in patch 2, minor commit rewording >> * Made conditional check more valgrind-friendly >> >> v1 -> v2 differences: >> >> * Updated changes to be protocol friendly >> * Updated block-commit tests to account for different error message >> wording >> * Updated block-commit tests to add relative backing filename tests >> * In bdrv_find_backing_image(), use g_malloc() instead of char arrays >> >> >> Jeff Cody (4): >> block: make bdrv_find_backing_image compare canonical filenames >> block: in commit, determine base image from the top image >> qemu-iotests: qemu-io tests update for block-commit (040) >> qemu-iotests: add relative backing file tests for block-commit (040) > > Should patch 3/4 be squashed into 2/4 to avoid 'git bisect' failures > when running the testsuite? Other than that, series: Yes, I agree. Applied all and squashed 3/4 into 2/4. Kevin