From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Cc: libvir-list@redhat.com, Corey Bryant <coreyb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 4/4] qemu-config: Add new -add-fd command line option
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 16:02:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <507EBA60.9000000@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <507E3103.1020202@redhat.com>
Am 17.10.2012 06:16, schrieb Eric Blake:
> I'm still seeing the corner case of:
>
> qemu-kvm -add-fd fd=3,set=1 -add-fd fd=4,set=2 4<&-
>
> where the dup(3) will populate fd 4 prior to the point where we get to
> process the -add-fd fd=4 command to notice that the user started
> qemu-kvm with fd 4 closed, and thus qemu will silently proceed to use
> the wrong fd.
>
> On the other hand, I'm not sure if that corner case is worth worrying
> about, or if we just chalk it up to user stupidity (aka libvirt
> programmer stupidity) if they did something like that (most likely,
> because the management app forgot to clear FD_CLOEXEC before exec()ing
> qemu-kvm).
If you specify an FD number that isn't actually open when qemu is
stared, you can get any FD that qemu opens internally. I think the
correct answer to this problem is "then don't do that".
> Hmm, this makes me wonder if I can do something crazy like:
>
> qemu-kvm -add-fd fd=4,set=1 -qmp /dev/fdset/1
>
> to open a monitor on the fd I just passed in?
I think so. At least on my side it was intended to allow this.
> And what if so, what then
> happens on that monitor if I request that fdset 1 be removed?
The same as with block devices: The fd stays open until the monitor
connection is closed. A closed monitor also triggers fd garbage
collection, so at this point the original fd would be closed (well,
assuming that you had only one monitor).
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-17 14:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-16 18:10 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 4/4] qemu-config: Add new -add-fd command line option Corey Bryant
2012-10-17 4:16 ` Eric Blake
2012-10-17 14:02 ` Kevin Wolf [this message]
2012-10-17 15:01 ` Eric Blake
2012-10-17 15:03 ` Kevin Wolf
2012-10-18 14:34 ` Corey Bryant
2012-10-18 14:29 ` Corey Bryant
2012-10-18 18:50 ` Corey Bryant
2012-10-18 13:48 ` Corey Bryant
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=507EBA60.9000000@redhat.com \
--to=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=coreyb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=libvir-list@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).