From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:56030) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TOXeV-0002yk-Sa for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Oct 2012 13:43:35 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TOXeQ-0003Ji-5x for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Oct 2012 13:43:31 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:36195) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TOXeP-0003Je-Ur for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Oct 2012 13:43:26 -0400 Message-ID: <507EE664.1070605@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 19:09:56 +0200 From: Avi Kivity MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1350489629-1838-1-git-send-email-benoit@irqsave.net> In-Reply-To: <1350489629-1838-1-git-send-email-benoit@irqsave.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC V2 00/20] QCOW2 deduplication List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?UTF-8?B?QmVub8OudCBDYW5ldA==?= Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, stefanha@redhat.com On 10/17/2012 06:00 PM, Beno=C3=AEt Canet wrote: > This patchset is a not yet working draft starting to implement deduplic= ation > in QCOW2. >=20 > The Kernel red black trees are indented in kernel style. > I'll be happy to know what is the policy regarding this kind of inclusi= on > and what tools can be used to make the style compliant. Can you use glib GTree instead? > I am posting this patchset in order to have an early feedback regarding= the > design. Since it's still not working, it's hard to tell how effective it is in practice. --=20 error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function