From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:52134) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TOpqL-0004Le-TH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 09:09:00 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TOpqF-0000h2-6E for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 09:08:57 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:40813) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TOpqE-0000gs-UO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 09:08:51 -0400 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q9ID8oS1021638 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 09:08:50 -0400 Message-ID: <507FFF5F.6000203@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 15:08:47 +0200 From: Kevin Wolf MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1348675011-8794-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <1348675011-8794-30-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <507FF958.1080005@redhat.com> <507FFB27.3000404@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <507FFB27.3000404@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 29/45] qemu-iotests: add mirroring test case List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: jcody@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org Am 18.10.2012 14:50, schrieb Paolo Bonzini: > Il 18/10/2012 14:43, Kevin Wolf ha scritto: >>>> tests/qemu-iotests/040 | 353 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>> tests/qemu-iotests/040.out | 5 + >>>> tests/qemu-iotests/group | 3 +- >>>> 3 file modificati, 360 inserzioni(+). 1 rimozione(-) >>>> create mode 100755 tests/qemu-iotests/040 >>>> create mode 100644 tests/qemu-iotests/040.out >> How about another case for cancelling while the image isn't ready yet? > > Sure. > >> Also, 040 is already taken. Should this becomes 041 then? Or if I missed >> the real 041, this would have to become 044. > > Yes, this is already 041 in my tree. > > Should I submit the next batch up to here, or do you want to wait until 33? I've just completed review of 33/45, so you can submit up to 33. Kevin