From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50814) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TQPDD-00013S-6C for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 17:07:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TQPDC-0000mw-50 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 17:07:03 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:8265) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TQPDB-0000mm-Sk for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 17:07:02 -0400 Message-ID: <5085B572.4050100@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 17:06:58 -0400 From: Cole Robinson MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <75a3282f64955a723e86f90ef3ccf9bc48871ebc.1349647745.git.crobinso@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] hw/arm_boot.c: bump initrd address (again) to accommodate large kernels List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Paul Whalen On 10/07/2012 06:36 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 7 October 2012 23:27, Cole Robinson wrote: >> From: Paul Whalen >> >> Fedora ARM is generating kernels that exceed the hardcoded size limits: >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=862766 >> >> Bump the load address, as was previously done in 756ba3b >> >> Signed-off-by: Cole Robinson >> --- >> hw/arm_boot.c | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/hw/arm_boot.c b/hw/arm_boot.c >> index a6e9143..3cabb71 100644 >> --- a/hw/arm_boot.c >> +++ b/hw/arm_boot.c >> @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ >> >> #define KERNEL_ARGS_ADDR 0x100 >> #define KERNEL_LOAD_ADDR 0x00010000 >> -#define INITRD_LOAD_ADDR 0x00d00000 >> +#define INITRD_LOAD_ADDR 0x01d00000 > > This makes me sad but I still have no idea what we could > do that would be better than this... > Hi Peter, I agree it's unfortunate, but in the absence of a better solution, could this patch be applied? Thanks, Cole