From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:42846) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TQfhI-0000kI-G5 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 10:43:13 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TQfhC-0006E3-BG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 10:43:12 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:37743) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TQfhC-0006Dg-2m for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 10:43:06 -0400 Message-ID: <5086ABB0.5060506@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 16:37:36 +0200 From: Kevin Wolf MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1350592864-10408-1-git-send-email-coreyb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <1350592864-10408-1-git-send-email-coreyb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] osdep: Less restrictive F_SEFL in qemu_dup_flags() List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Corey Bryant Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org Am 18.10.2012 22:41, schrieb Corey Bryant: > qemu_dup_flags() currently limits the flags that can be set on the > fcntl() F_SETFL call to those that we currently know can be set with > fcntl() F_SETFL. The problem with this is that it will prevent use > of new flags in the future without a code update. > > This patch relaxes the checking and lets fcntl() determine the flags > it can set. > > Signed-off-by: Corey Bryant Thanks, applied to the block branch. Kevin