From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:40708) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TR2mS-0000F0-D9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 11:22:11 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TR2mI-0004Ae-Nc for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 11:22:04 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:12582) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TR2mI-0004AE-Fu for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 11:21:54 -0400 Message-ID: <5088078B.3070002@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 17:21:47 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1350479712-15082-1-git-send-email-otubo@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1350479712-15082-4-git-send-email-otubo@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <50801D29.2080305@redhat.com> <5087F899.2030604@linux.vnet.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <5087F899.2030604@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/4] Warning messages on net devices hotplug List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Corey Bryant Cc: pmoore@redhat.com, aliguori@us.ibm.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Eduardo Otubo Il 24/10/2012 16:18, Corey Bryant ha scritto: > > > On 10/18/2012 11:15 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> Il 17/10/2012 15:15, Eduardo Otubo ha scritto: >>> With the inclusion of the new "double whitelist" seccomp filter, Qemu >>> won't be able to execve() in runtime, thus, no hotplug net devices >>> allowed. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Otubo >> >> Please check this in net_init_tap instead. When using libvirt, hotplug >> is done with a completely different mechanism that involves >> file-descriptor passing and does not require executing a helper. >> >> Paolo >> > > Are you sure net_init_tap() is the right place for this check? Yes, assuming there is a global that says whether the seccomp sandbox is in effect. Even something like "if (sandbox_active && !tap->has_fd) error(...)" can be enough. Paolo