From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:57430) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TToiq-0000yR-JH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 01 Nov 2012 02:57:49 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TToip-0006xr-G7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 01 Nov 2012 02:57:48 -0400 Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.3]:61914) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TToip-0006xm-6k for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 01 Nov 2012 02:57:47 -0400 Message-ID: <50921D63.9@web.de> Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2012 07:57:39 +0100 From: Jan Kiszka MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <5090C1B8.4060002@web.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig0C4B6DB1ADD834F2A159EB0C" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] ISA BIOS mapping for system flash emulation List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jordan Justen Cc: qemu-devel This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig0C4B6DB1ADD834F2A159EB0C Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2012-11-01 03:55, Jordan Justen wrote: > On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 11:14 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:= >> Hi Jordan, >> >> I was starring at pc_isa_bios_init and wondering why you are creating = a >> copy of the system flash for the low ISA range instead of using an ali= as >> here as well, just like old_pc_system_rom_init does. That means the IS= A >> BIOS range can run out of sync when the system flash is updated during= >> runtime and requires a restart of QEMU then. Switching to an alias wou= ld >> also allow some code consolidation. Can you explain the idea behind th= e >> current version? >=20 > I'm pretty sure I tried this and found that it did not work on the flas= h device. >=20 > I wrote an email to the list on Oct 17, 2011 about this, but I didn't > get a response. (Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/4] pc: Support system flash > memory with pflash) Can you be more specific how/when it failed? A trivial test cannot confirm this so far. Jan --------------enig0C4B6DB1ADD834F2A159EB0C Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlCSHWcACgkQitSsb3rl5xRW0ACg2ISrp/RxrQgKdpAvTpM0M3mI FjQAn28a9F2JxQMnp30Gx1Vqt2ZJvxcF =Qv6j -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig0C4B6DB1ADD834F2A159EB0C--