From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54391) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TUJNf-0000Yz-SA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 02 Nov 2012 11:42:00 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TUJNe-00080o-PS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 02 Nov 2012 11:41:59 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:5124) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TUJNe-00080W-Hz for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 02 Nov 2012 11:41:58 -0400 Message-ID: <5093E9C1.408@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2012 16:41:53 +0100 From: Gerd Hoffmann MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1351868083-26313-1-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org> <5093E0F5.6030106@web.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] ui/cocoa.m: Update to new DisplayChangeListener member names List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVy?= , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, patches@linaro.org Hi, > (I have a philosophical preference for compile fixes being applied > directly and quickly to master but my opinion on that matter is > not particularly significant :-)) /me too. Build fixes should go in on the fast track. First because a broken build is annonying. Second because buildbots are less useful if builds are broken for longer periods. One of the reasons I didn't notice the xenfb breakage was because the fedora build is broken for other reasons, so the buildbot doesn't came to the point where it tries to build xenfb.c and figures it doesn't. Should we maybe agree on a special buildfix patch subject tag, so maintainers can easily filter and prioritize them? cheers, Gerd