From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:57631)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas.faerber@web.de>) id 1TUJQW-00030w-Lf
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 02 Nov 2012 11:44:57 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas.faerber@web.de>) id 1TUJQV-0000RZ-L6
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 02 Nov 2012 11:44:56 -0400
Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.4]:52457)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas.faerber@web.de>) id 1TUJQV-0000RV-BR
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 02 Nov 2012 11:44:55 -0400
Message-ID: <5093EA74.8060904@web.de>
Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2012 16:44:52 +0100
From: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVy?= <andreas.faerber@web.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1351868083-26313-1-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org>
	<5093E0F5.6030106@web.de>
	<CAFEAcA_36e0BSAd_FGMYLeHYA1_n-sHPu-NLETJ7SnM8ytxXog@mail.gmail.com>
	<5093E9C1.408@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <5093E9C1.408@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] ui/cocoa.m: Update to new
 DisplayChangeListener member names
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>, patches@linaro.org

Hi,

Am 02.11.2012 16:41, schrieb Gerd Hoffmann:
>> (I have a philosophical preference for compile fixes being applied
>> directly and quickly to master but my opinion on that matter is
>> not particularly significant :-))
> 
> /me too.  Build fixes should go in on the fast track.  First because a
> broken build is annonying.  Second because buildbots are less useful if
> builds are broken for longer periods.

Fine with me, less work. We should cc a maintainer then. ;)

> One of the reasons I didn't notice the xenfb breakage was because the
> fedora build is broken for other reasons, so the buildbot doesn't came
> to the point where it tries to build xenfb.c and figures it doesn't.
> 
> Should we maybe agree on a special buildfix patch subject tag, so
> maintainers can easily filter and prioritize them?

I used [PATCH buildfix] or so in the past.

Regards,
Andreas