From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:51781) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gpKVA-0000qT-1x for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 31 Jan 2019 17:08:07 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gpKIt-0001vT-R9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 31 Jan 2019 16:55:24 -0500 Received: from mail-pl1-x643.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::643]:44765) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gpKIt-0001ub-BQ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 31 Jan 2019 16:55:23 -0500 Received: by mail-pl1-x643.google.com with SMTP id e11so2079213plt.11 for ; Thu, 31 Jan 2019 13:55:23 -0800 (PST) References: <1548769067-20792-1-git-send-email-thuth@redhat.com> <20190129145156.6719b8a4.cohuck@redhat.com> From: Richard Henderson Message-ID: <509e6dca-8c78-947f-cf91-15ad02510bba@linaro.org> Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2019 13:55:19 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target/s390x: Fix LGPL version in the file header comments List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Eric Blake , Cornelia Huck , Thomas Huth Cc: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 1/30/19 7:01 AM, Eric Blake wrote: > On 1/29/19 7:51 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote: >> Given that there have been several of these cases (and that there's a >> lot of boilerplate in general): Should we adopt SPDX license >> identifiers for QEMU, as the Linux kernel did? They also discovered and >> fixed some problems/oddities while at it. > > I'm also in favor of SPDX license identifiers - their brevity and > machine-parsability favors more accurate usage and fewer copy/paste > mistake propagation. +1. r~