From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: liu ping fan <qemulist@gmail.com>
Cc: Vasilis Liaskovitis <vasilis.liaskovitis@profitbricks.com>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>,
Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v1 1/3] bouce buffer has fine grain lock
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 09:53:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50A0B907.1090304@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJnKYQ=fS6HqNnAG02sQgwRNhvWa_YJrRXMi5yfNQKy=dW-_Jg@mail.gmail.com>
Il 12/11/2012 07:23, liu ping fan ha scritto:
>> > Also, you do not need to keep the lock after address_space_map exits.
>> > In fact, it can be released as soon as bounce.buffer is written to.
>> > After that point, bounce will not be touched (the lock only serves to
>> > serialize writes to bounce.buffer). That is,
>> >
> But w/o the lock, the content in bounce.buffer for threadA, can be
> flushed with thread B.
It doesn't matter _which_ thread calls address_space_unmap. As long as
it's only one, you do not need a lock. In fact, it is perfectly fine
for thread A to call address_space_map and pass the address to thread B.
Thread B will later call address_space_unmap.
The important thing is that only one thread will call
address_space_unmap with buffer == bounce.buffer. So you do not need a
lock to serialize the writes in address_space_unmap.
See thread-pool.c for a similar trick:
/* Moving state out of THREAD_QUEUED is protected by lock. After
* that, only the worker thread can write to it. Reads and writes
* of state and ret are ordered with memory barriers.
*/
enum ThreadState state;
int ret;
...
qemu_mutex_lock(&lock);
...
req->state = THREAD_ACTIVE;
qemu_mutex_unlock(&lock);
req->ret = req->func(req->arg);
smp_wmb();
req->state = THREAD_DONE;
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-12 8:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-09 3:14 [Qemu-devel] [RFC v1 0/3] make address_space_map() safe without biglock's protection Liu Ping Fan
2012-11-09 3:14 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v1 1/3] bouce buffer has fine grain lock Liu Ping Fan
2012-11-10 1:49 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-11-12 6:23 ` liu ping fan
2012-11-12 8:53 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2012-11-09 3:14 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v1 2/3] ramlist: apply fine grain lock for ram_list Liu Ping Fan
2012-11-10 1:54 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-11-12 6:22 ` liu ping fan
2012-11-12 8:48 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-11-13 6:07 ` liu ping fan
2012-11-09 3:14 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v1 3/3] make address_space_map safe Liu Ping Fan
[not found] ` <20130213121214.GC4576@dhcp-192-168-178-175.profitbricks.localdomain>
2013-03-07 1:59 ` liu ping fan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50A0B907.1090304@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemulist@gmail.com \
--cc=stefanha@gmail.com \
--cc=vasilis.liaskovitis@profitbricks.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).