qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Corey Bryant <coreyb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: andreas.niederl@iaik.tugraz.at, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	anthony@codemonkey.ws, mst@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V19 1/7] Support for TPM command line	options
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 08:04:10 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50A0F3CA.5090009@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <509BD554.1080708@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On 11/08/2012 10:52 AM, Corey Bryant wrote:
>
>
> On 10/24/2012 03:06 PM, Stefan Berger wrote:
>> On 09/27/2012 10:12 AM, Corey Bryant wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 06/04/2012 03:37 PM, Stefan Berger wrote:
>>
>>>> +    if (!QLIST_EMPTY(&tpm_backends)) {
>>>> +        error_report("Only one TPM is allowed.\n");
>>>> +        return 1;
>>>> +    }
>>>
>>> A list of tpm_backends is maintained and walked in a few places, but
>>> only one is allowed to be added to the list.  Will it ever make sense
>>> to enable multiple backends at one time?
>>>
>>
>> A list is also returned through the monitor. This list can at the moment
>> only have maximum of one entry. I would keep that list there unless
>> someone else opposes. It may be possible to create different types of
>> hardware emulation interfaces or simply replicate the TPM TIS at
>> different addresses. So I cannot say whether it will 'ever make sense'
>> to do that but I'd rather keep the opportunity there than close it and
>> with that also let the monitor return a list of items rather than a
>> single item.
>>
>> I removed the processing of the lists in this part of the code at least.
>>
>
> Ok and it doesn't hurt to keep the list processing.  In that case you 
> might as well keep the list processing code everywhere that you 
> already have it.
>

I was only going to keep it in the monitor part now...
+ */
>>>> +int tpm_config_parse(QemuOptsList *opts_list, const char *optarg)
>>>> +{
>>>> +    QemuOpts *opts;
>>>> +
>>>> +    if (strcmp("none", optarg) != 0) {
>>>
>>> What's the point of supporting "-tpmdev none"?
>>>
>>
>> Removed.
>>
>
> There must have been a reason you added it in the first place that I'm 
> just not aware of.  Did someone else suggest adding it?

Not that I can remember.The option would have been useful if every VM by 
default had a TPM, similar to the physical world today, but it's 
unlikely that this will happen.


Regards,
     Stefan

  reply	other threads:[~2012-11-12 13:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-04 19:37 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V19 0/7] Qemu Trusted Platform Module (TPM) integration Stefan Berger
2012-06-04 19:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V19 1/7] Support for TPM command line options Stefan Berger
2012-09-27 14:12   ` Corey Bryant
2012-10-24 19:06     ` Stefan Berger
2012-11-08 15:52       ` Corey Bryant
2012-11-12 13:04         ` Stefan Berger [this message]
2012-06-04 19:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V19 2/7] Add TPM (frontend) hardware interface (TPM TIS) to Qemu Stefan Berger
2012-09-27 14:22   ` Corey Bryant
2012-10-24 18:46     ` Stefan Berger
2012-11-08 15:39       ` Corey Bryant
2012-11-12 13:16         ` Stefan Berger
2012-11-12 18:48           ` Corey Bryant
2012-10-03 18:35   ` Corey Bryant
2012-06-04 19:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V19 3/7] Add a debug register Stefan Berger
2012-09-27 14:23   ` Corey Bryant
2012-06-04 19:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V19 4/7] Build the TPM frontend code Stefan Berger
2012-09-27 14:24   ` Corey Bryant
2012-06-04 19:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V19 5/7] Add a TPM Passthrough backend driver implementation Stefan Berger
2012-09-27 14:28   ` Corey Bryant
2012-10-24 19:07     ` Stefan Berger
2012-06-04 19:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V19 6/7] Introduce --enable-tpm-passthrough configure option Stefan Berger
2012-09-27 14:29   ` Corey Bryant
2012-06-04 19:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V19 7/7] Add fd parameter for TPM passthrough driver Stefan Berger
2012-09-27 14:35   ` Corey Bryant
2012-10-03 18:46   ` Corey Bryant
2012-10-24 19:06     ` Stefan Berger
2012-06-04 19:56 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V19 0/7] Qemu Trusted Platform Module (TPM) integration Stefan Weil
2012-06-04 23:08   ` Anthony Liguori
2012-09-27 14:59 ` Corey Bryant
2012-09-28 22:43   ` Stefan Berger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50A0F3CA.5090009@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=andreas.niederl@iaik.tugraz.at \
    --cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
    --cc=coreyb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).