From: "KONRAD Frédéric" <fred.konrad@greensocs.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, aliguori@us.ibm.com,
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
Mark Burton <mark.burton@greensocs.com>,
Evgeny Voevodin <e.voevodin@samsung.com>,
agraf@suse.de, cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Virtio refactoring.
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 15:27:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50A258ED.7080807@greensocs.com> (raw)
Hi,
Just to be sure that we are all understanding the same thing about the
virtio
refactoring.
The old patch-set ( git://git.greensocs.com/qemu_virtio.git virtio ) I
sent was
not good because :
* It use a custom transport property ( e.g : transport=virtio-mmio.0 ) for
selecting a transport device between refactored virtio-pci and
virtio-mmio
which isn't QOM compliant.
* It wasn't easily reviewable, because the virtio-pci-new.c file is
created at
the beginning of the patch-set in order to keep virtio-pci.c ( and not
breaking the virtio-*-pci devices ).
To fix this, an idea is to use a new qbus named VirtioBus to link virtio-pci
or virtio-mmio with all the virtio backend ( VirtioDevice ). So
"virtio-pci" and
"virtio-mmio" will have a VirtioBus.
To do that we will do the following things in the right order :
* Introduce a new VirtioBus ( same way as scsi-bus.c ), with
VirtIODevice
interface :
-> callback to completely abstract the VirtioDevice from
VirtioPCI.
-> for the queue, load/save the queue/config, features, ...,
other ?
* Add a VirtioBus to the VirtioPCIProxy. ( virtio-pci.c ) :
-> moving all to the newer callback.
* For each of the virtio-device : ( virtio-x.c )
-> making a separate class for virtio-x which is a VirtioDevice.
-> making a virtio-x-pci which has a virtio-x.
* Create virtio-mmio ( virtio-mmio.c ).
Is it the right approach ? Do I miss something ?
When it will work, we must be sure of :
-> migration compatibility.
-> not breaking the s390 transport.
-> compatibility with s390 ccw.
Fred
next reply other threads:[~2012-11-13 14:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-13 14:27 KONRAD Frédéric [this message]
2012-11-13 15:32 ` [Qemu-devel] Virtio refactoring Cornelia Huck
2012-11-13 16:31 ` KONRAD Frédéric
2012-11-13 18:09 ` Cornelia Huck
2012-11-15 10:32 ` KONRAD Frédéric
2012-11-15 12:05 ` Cornelia Huck
2012-11-13 23:00 ` Andreas Färber
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50A258ED.7080807@greensocs.com \
--to=fred.konrad@greensocs.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
--cc=e.voevodin@samsung.com \
--cc=mark.burton@greensocs.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).