qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wenchao Xia <xiawenc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
	Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>,
	Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>,
	qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] libqblock OOM issue
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 12:18:37 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50A46D1D.5040503@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50A37325.9030607@redhat.com>

于 2012-11-14 18:32, Paolo Bonzini 写道:
> Il 14/11/2012 10:55, Wenchao Xia ha scritto:
>>>     In order to resolve OOM issue, I am trying wrap all APIs using
>>> sunrpc, need some suggestion before coding.
>>
>> Is the client/server approach really necessary or can you write a
>> library that invokes qemu-nbd/qemu-img?
>>
>> If there is a startup cost problem with qemu-img it may be possible to
>> add an interactive mode (like qemu-io) where qemu-img stays open and
>> responds to commands (maybe in JSON encoding).
>>
>> The difference between this and the RPC approach is that you can write a
>> relatively thin NBD and qemu-img library with the tools that already
>> exist today.
>
> In fact, I think this is not our issue.  If libvirt wants to use
> libqblock but have a problem with OOM exit, they can write their own
> wrappers to do the simple tasks they need, or just keep on using
> qemu-img with JSON output (possibly extending it and keeping the
> functionality upstream).  For many of those tasks, it may turn out that
> qemu-img extensions would be useful anyway.
>
> Paolo
>
   Personally agree, but I want to add a simple wrapper to let libqblock
get user faster. In this way I guess best choice now is making rpc
client and server not mirrored in implemention, server provides
r/w/info retrieving capabilities via XDR protocol, client keeps
the API unchanged but implement a bit different than server, which
may archieve the same effect as invoking qemu-img inside without string
parsing.
   Not sure if libqblock now is blocked by OOM issue as 1st version to
be reviewed. If you think it must be resolved first, I would add this
wrapper quickly.

-- 
Best Regards

Wenchao Xia

  reply	other threads:[~2012-11-15  4:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <50A313A5.8030500@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2012-11-14  3:50 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC] libqblock OOM issue Wenchao Xia
2012-11-14  8:45   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-11-14  9:55     ` Wenchao Xia
2012-11-14 10:32       ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-11-15  4:18         ` Wenchao Xia [this message]
2012-11-15 10:31           ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-11-15 12:21             ` Wenchao Xia
2012-11-15 12:34               ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-11-14  8:55   ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-11-14 10:06     ` Wenchao Xia

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50A46D1D.5040503@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=xiawenc@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=blauwirbel@gmail.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).