From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:40035) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TZ2S8-0006w2-CN for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 11:38:11 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TZ2S5-0004ar-AU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 11:38:08 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:17678) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TZ2S5-0004al-2I for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 11:38:05 -0500 Message-ID: <50A51A52.4000807@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 17:37:38 +0100 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <50A50150.8010201@dlhnet.de> <50A5101E.1030705@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] iscsi: fix deadlock during login List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: ronnie sahlberg Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, Peter Lieven , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" Il 15/11/2012 17:13, ronnie sahlberg ha scritto: > On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 7:54 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> Il 15/11/2012 15:57, ronnie sahlberg ha scritto: >>> I dont know if we should switch to use synchronous code here. >>> It is much nicer if all code is async. >> >> bdrv_open is generally synchronous, so I think Peter's patch is ok. > > I was thinking about the case where you disconnect/reconnect a device > at runtime. Like swapping the medium in a CDROM. > If bdrv_open() is synchronous and blocks for a long time, would that > not impact the rest of QEMU? Yes, it's not optimal, but VCPUs would still run until they request I/O. But usually iscsi devices should be non-removable, no? That leaves hotplug as the only problematic case. Paolo > > Otherwise: > Acked-by: ronniesahlberg@gmail.com > >> >> Paolo >> >>> Is it possible to add a timeout instead that would break out if the >>> connect/login has not completed within a certain amount of time? >>