From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:46089)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kwolf@redhat.com>) id 1TaU4E-0007BJ-IG
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 11:19:32 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kwolf@redhat.com>) id 1TaU47-0003yb-0f
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 11:19:26 -0500
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:32452)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kwolf@redhat.com>) id 1TaU46-0003yU-PB
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 11:19:18 -0500
Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com
	(int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qAJGJIV1013626
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK)
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 11:19:18 -0500
Message-ID: <50AA5C03.4050105@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 17:19:15 +0100
From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <9cdf58cc9d0e9476a0d549176f14e6f40bbb7d51.1353339221.git.jcody@redhat.com>
	<50AA5426.3060203@redhat.com> <50AA5B58.8080509@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <50AA5B58.8080509@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] block: add bdrv_reopen() support for raw
	hdev devices
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: jcody@redhat.com
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, stefanha@redhat.com

Am 19.11.2012 17:16, schrieb Jeff Cody:
> On 11/19/2012 10:45 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> Am 19.11.2012 16:37, schrieb Jeff Cody:
>>> The host device reopen handler for raw-posix is the same as the file reopen
>>> handler.
>>>
> 
>>
>> What about host_floppy and (twice) host_cdrom?
>>
>> Kevin
>>
> 
> Do we need / want reopen for floppy and/or cdrom?

At least I can't see what makes it less reasonable than for host_device.
They are really just host_device with one or two additional callbacks
for handling removable media.

Kevin