From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50689) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tb5i9-0000St-Dq for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 03:31:15 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tb5i5-0007ih-AE for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 03:31:09 -0500 Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.3]:56993) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tb5i4-0007iL-ES for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 03:31:05 -0500 Message-ID: <50AC9132.6050806@web.de> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 09:30:42 +0100 From: Jan Kiszka MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1353460020.17856.25.camel@pasglop> In-Reply-To: <1353460020.17856.25.camel@pasglop> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig94FA054824049C92C49AAB82" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Interrupt controller updates List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Cc: Peter Maydell , David Gibson , Alexander Graf , kvm@vger.kernel.org, "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig94FA054824049C92C49AAB82 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2012-11-21 02:07, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > Hi Jan ! >=20 > David (CC) want to make some progress with our in-kernel PIC. From > memory, one of the outcomes of the BOF was that we need to move the > existing "enable in-kernel PIC" from generic KVM init to machine init i= n > order to be able to add an argument indicating the "model" use by the > arch/platform since some like ours support several different models and= > since that all needs to be selected before the VCPUs are created. >=20 > Again, from memory, you were volunteered to do the initial x86 change s= o > we could piggy back on it :-) Or do I remember wrong ? I guess I wasn't in the room at that time ;). I don't have much bandwidth the very next weeks to work on this, so I guess it's better you come up with a patch proposal. Jan --------------enig94FA054824049C92C49AAB82 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlCskTIACgkQitSsb3rl5xQXqQCgpVU+2WoAmQL2iZqUcC69HIDd XjgAn3W/Nv5g5J4c9Qp2A814EyQBSNFJ =nV5z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig94FA054824049C92C49AAB82--