From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
To: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Cc: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>,
Jens Freimann <jfrei@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Heinz Graalfs <graalfs@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
"Jason J. herne" <jjherne@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] s390/migration: Provide a cpu save for initial life migration work
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 16:08:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50ACEE8A.8050302@de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50ACEE12.4000800@suse.de>
On 21/11/12 16:06, Alexander Graf wrote:
[...]
>>>>>> +static int cpu_post_load(void *opaque, int version_id)
>>>>>> +{
>>>>>> + CPUS390XState *env = opaque;
>>>>>> + struct kvm_fpu fpu;
>>>>>> + int i, r;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + if (!kvm_enabled()) {
>>>>>> + return 0;
>>>>>> + }
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + for (i = 0; i< 16; i++) {
>>>>>> + fpu.fprs[i] = env->fregs[i].ll;
>>>>>> + }
>>>>>> + fpu.fpc = env->fpc;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + r = kvm_vcpu_ioctl(env, KVM_SET_FPU,&fpu);
>>>>>> + assert(r == 0);
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + return 0;
>>>>>> +}
>>>>> The kvm register sync needs to happen in the kvm register sync function :)
>>>> That would eliminate the whole purpose of sync regs and forces us to have an
>>>> expensive ioctl on lots of exits (again). I would prefer to sync the registers
>>>> that we never need in qemu just here.
>>> That's why the register sync has different stages.
>> Not the get_register. Which is called on every synchronize_state. Which happen quite often
>> on s390.
>
> Sounds like bad design then :).
>
> Maybe we should explicitly tell the register synchronization which register sets to sync, so that we don't waste time getting _all_ the state every time we sync registers?
Yes, a level statement for kvm_arch_get_registers would be good.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-21 15:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-21 14:46 [Qemu-devel] [RFC/PATCH 0/3] Initial migration patches for s390 Christian Borntraeger
2012-11-21 14:46 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] s390/migration: Provide a cpu save for initial life migration work Christian Borntraeger
2012-11-21 14:56 ` Alexander Graf
2012-11-21 14:59 ` Christian Borntraeger
2012-11-21 15:02 ` Alexander Graf
2012-11-21 15:03 ` Christian Borntraeger
2012-11-21 15:06 ` Alexander Graf
2012-11-21 15:08 ` Christian Borntraeger [this message]
2012-11-21 15:22 ` Jan Kiszka
2012-11-21 15:27 ` Christian Borntraeger
2012-11-21 15:32 ` Jan Kiszka
2012-11-21 14:46 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] s390/migration: Qemu S390 special register migration Christian Borntraeger
2012-11-21 14:57 ` Alexander Graf
2012-11-21 14:46 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] s390/migration: Add code to support SCLP live migration Christian Borntraeger
2012-11-21 14:58 ` Alexander Graf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50ACEE8A.8050302@de.ibm.com \
--to=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=graalfs@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=jfrei@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=jjherne@us.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).