From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:37962) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TceKN-0006kM-Fm for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 10:41:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TceKM-00039d-Kn for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 10:41:03 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:39366) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TceKM-00039X-DM for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 10:41:02 -0500 Message-ID: <50B23C05.7090502@redhat.com> Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2012 17:40:53 +0200 From: Avi Kivity MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <50B1E06F.5000703@redhat.com> <50B232E5.4030302@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <50B232E5.4030302@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V10 0/8] memory: unify ioport registration List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andreas_F=E4rber?= Cc: Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com, jan.kiszka@siemens.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Julien Grall , kraxel@redhat.com, Anthony Liguori On 11/25/2012 05:01 PM, Andreas F=E4rber wrote: >=20 > Note that there are still some register_ioport_*() usages left: > $ git grep register_ioport -- hw/ | grep -v isa_register_ioport | wc --= lines > 32 >=20 For the record, my plan for when that number drops to zero was to use address_space_rw() (or friends) directly from the ioport helpers or kvm code. There should not be an address_space_io for non-x86; the I/O address space would be just a memory region under a bridge somewhere. --=20 error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function