From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:46352) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Td1kD-0004iP-2n for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 26 Nov 2012 11:41:26 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Td1k9-0004TD-26 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 26 Nov 2012 11:41:17 -0500 Received: from e9.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.139]:57449) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Td1k8-0004Sp-Te for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 26 Nov 2012 11:41:12 -0500 Received: from /spool/local by e9.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 26 Nov 2012 11:41:11 -0500 Received: from d01relay01.pok.ibm.com (d01relay01.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.233]) by d01dlp02.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA3BF6E8078 for ; Mon, 26 Nov 2012 11:41:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from d01av03.pok.ibm.com (d01av03.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.217]) by d01relay01.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id qAQGf75N255890 for ; Mon, 26 Nov 2012 11:41:08 -0500 Received: from d01av03.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av03.pok.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id qAQGf7EB016513 for ; Mon, 26 Nov 2012 14:41:07 -0200 Message-ID: <50B39BA2.8070503@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 11:41:06 -0500 From: Corey Bryant MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1352749698-1219-1-git-send-email-otubo@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20121121132043.GB28214@bluepex.com> <3108382.kUZmsgcyl9@sifl> In-Reply-To: <3108382.kUZmsgcyl9@sifl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv3 1/5] seccomp: adding new syscalls (bugzilla 855162) List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paul Moore Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Eduardo Otubo On 11/21/2012 10:24 AM, Paul Moore wrote: > On Wednesday, November 21, 2012 11:20:44 AM Eduardo Otubo wrote: >> Hello folks, >> >> Does anyone had a chance to take a look at this? We would like to get >> this into the 1.3 release. >> >> Thanks again :) > > I way a bit delayed due to travel, but I started playing with it a bit > yesterday afternoon and unfortunately it still doesn't work for me (using the > same test/reproducer I documented in the RH BZ). I've tried running QEMU both > via libvirt and the command line (using a libvirt derived command line). > > I'm applying the patches to the F17 QEMU 1.2 package; there is some minor > fixup needed in the configure script but nothing major. > > What is further frustrating is that the debug code (patch 5/5) doesn't seem to > output the problematic syscall. I wanted to investigate this a bit more > before responding, but with the holiday approaching (Thanksgiving in the US), > I'm not sure how much progress I'll be able to make for the remainder of this > week. Sorry about that. > > If you have any further questions about how, or what, I'm testing, just ask. > Paul, Is your host 32 or 64-bit? -- Regards, Corey Bryant