From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54401) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Td4q0-0006wc-KT for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 26 Nov 2012 14:59:29 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Td4pz-0004Oc-8f for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 26 Nov 2012 14:59:28 -0500 Received: from e4.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.144]:51708) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Td4pz-0004OX-4D for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 26 Nov 2012 14:59:27 -0500 Received: from /spool/local by e4.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 26 Nov 2012 14:59:25 -0500 Received: from d01relay05.pok.ibm.com (d01relay05.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.237]) by d01dlp03.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B21E7C9003C for ; Mon, 26 Nov 2012 14:59:22 -0500 (EST) Received: from d01av01.pok.ibm.com (d01av01.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.215]) by d01relay05.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id qAQJxMZo343240 for ; Mon, 26 Nov 2012 14:59:22 -0500 Received: from d01av01.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av01.pok.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id qAQJxLsj025650 for ; Mon, 26 Nov 2012 14:59:21 -0500 Message-ID: <50B3CA19.1050206@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 14:59:21 -0500 From: Corey Bryant MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1352749698-1219-1-git-send-email-otubo@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <3108382.kUZmsgcyl9@sifl> <50B39BA2.8070503@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <2283866.KgMUQUY9RY@sifl> In-Reply-To: <2283866.KgMUQUY9RY@sifl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv3 1/5] seccomp: adding new syscalls (bugzilla 855162) List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paul Moore Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Eduardo Otubo On 11/26/2012 12:08 PM, Paul Moore wrote: > On Monday, November 26, 2012 11:41:06 AM Corey Bryant wrote: >> On 11/21/2012 10:24 AM, Paul Moore wrote: >>> On Wednesday, November 21, 2012 11:20:44 AM Eduardo Otubo wrote: >>>> Hello folks, >>>> >>>> Does anyone had a chance to take a look at this? We would like to get >>>> this into the 1.3 release. >>>> >>>> Thanks again :) >>> >>> I way a bit delayed due to travel, but I started playing with it a bit >>> yesterday afternoon and unfortunately it still doesn't work for me (using >>> the same test/reproducer I documented in the RH BZ). I've tried running >>> QEMU both via libvirt and the command line (using a libvirt derived >>> command line). >>> >>> I'm applying the patches to the F17 QEMU 1.2 package; there is some minor >>> fixup needed in the configure script but nothing major. >>> >>> What is further frustrating is that the debug code (patch 5/5) doesn't >>> seem to output the problematic syscall. I wanted to investigate this a >>> bit more before responding, but with the holiday approaching >>> (Thanksgiving in the US), I'm not sure how much progress I'll be able to >>> make for the remainder of this week. Sorry about that. >>> >>> If you have any further questions about how, or what, I'm testing, just >>> ask. >> >> Paul, Is your host 32 or 64-bit? > > 64-bit > I'm having trouble recreating this. I'm running a Fedora 17 64-bit host and a Fedora 17 64-bit guest with domain XML that mirrors yours. Here's the domain XML I'm using and the resulting QEMU command line: Domain XML: http://pastebin.com/DWa4RQ1Y Command line: http://pastebin.com/2QTWsUhP I'm running with QEMU commit 8db972cfa469b4e4afd9c65e54e796b83b5ce3a2 which is 1.2.0 with: (a) just the first patch applied, as well as with (b) all of this patch series applied. Any thoughts on what could be different? -- Regards, Corey Bryant