From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58776) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TeSl6-0000mc-Ms for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 30 Nov 2012 10:44:09 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TeSkw-000274-JL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 30 Nov 2012 10:44:08 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:60985) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TeSkw-00026q-Bd for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 30 Nov 2012 10:43:58 -0500 Message-ID: <50B8D43A.5040002@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 16:43:54 +0100 From: Gerd Hoffmann MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1354289397-20961-1-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com> <1354289397-20961-2-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] seabios: update to b1c35f2b28cc0c94ebed8176ff61ac0e0b377798 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 11/30/12 16:41, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 30 November 2012 15:29, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: >> This patch updates the seabios submodule to commit >> b1c35f2b28cc0c94ebed8176ff61ac0e0b377798. > > Shouldn't this be in the same git commit as the new > binaries, so they're always in sync? It's in the same pull, patch 3/3 carries the binary update. Isn't that good enougth? cheers, Gerd