From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
To: li guang <lig.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
"ehabkost@redhat.com" <ehabkost@redhat.com>,
"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
"blauwirbel@gmail.com" <blauwirbel@gmail.com>,
"imammedo@redhat.com" <imammedo@redhat.com>,
"afaerber@suse.de" <afaerber@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] target-i386:make hw_breakpoint_enabled return bool type
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 09:53:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50BF0BA3.6080906@siemens.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1354668685.4342.5.camel@liguang.fnst.cn.fujitsu.com>
On 2012-12-05 01:51, li guang wrote:
> 在 2012-12-04二的 11:26 +0000,Peter Maydell写道:
>> On 4 December 2012 11:11, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com> wrote:
>>> On 2012-12-04 11:23, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>>> Doesn't this break the use of this function in target-i386/seg_helper.c:
>>>>
>>>> if (hw_breakpoint_enabled(env->dr[7], i) == 0x1) {
>>>>
>>>> which specifically wants to determine whether the breakpoint is
>>>> enabled only locally?
>
> It was changed to 'if (hw_breakpoint_enabled(env->dr[7], i)) {'
> in patch 3/3
Which is broken as it neglects the different types of "enabled".
>
>>>
>>> It does. And that also indicates the function is misnamed. Something
>>> like hw_breakpoint_state might be better.
>>
>
> misnamed? I think hw_breakpoint_enabled is ask whether breakpoint
> ^^^^^^^^
> is enabled or not, so it's almost suitable.
There are two types of enabled breakpoints: task-local and global. The
current hw_breakpoint_enabled returns both as a bitmask, and that is
causing the confusing and regression in your patches.
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RTC ITP SDP-DE
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-05 8:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-04 8:11 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] target-i386:define name of breakpoint bit in dr7 liguang
2012-12-04 8:11 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] target-i386:make hw_breakpoint_enabled return bool type liguang
2012-12-04 10:23 ` Peter Maydell
2012-12-04 11:11 ` Jan Kiszka
2012-12-04 11:26 ` Peter Maydell
2012-12-05 0:51 ` li guang
2012-12-05 8:53 ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2012-12-06 2:08 ` li guang
2012-12-06 2:18 ` li guang
2012-12-04 8:11 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] target-i386:slightly refactor dr7 related function liguang
2012-12-04 18:51 ` Blue Swirl
2012-12-05 0:56 ` li guang
2012-12-05 8:55 ` Jan Kiszka
2012-12-04 12:49 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] target-i386:define name of breakpoint bit in dr7 Peter Maydell
2012-12-05 2:07 ` li guang
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-12-06 3:03 liguang
2012-12-06 3:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] target-i386:make hw_breakpoint_enabled return bool type liguang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50BF0BA3.6080906@siemens.com \
--to=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=blauwirbel@gmail.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=lig.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).