* [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] target-i386:define name of breakpoint bit in dr7 @ 2012-12-04 8:11 liguang 2012-12-04 8:11 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] target-i386:make hw_breakpoint_enabled return bool type liguang ` (2 more replies) 0 siblings, 3 replies; 16+ messages in thread From: liguang @ 2012-12-04 8:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: afaerber, ehabkost, imammedo, blauwirbel, jan.kiszka, qemu-devel; +Cc: liguang Signed-off-by: liguang <lig.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> --- target-i386/cpu.h | 7 +++++++ 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/target-i386/cpu.h b/target-i386/cpu.h index 90ef1ff..9abec3e 100644 --- a/target-i386/cpu.h +++ b/target-i386/cpu.h @@ -231,6 +231,13 @@ #define DR7_TYPE_SHIFT 16 #define DR7_LEN_SHIFT 18 #define DR7_FIXED_1 0x00000400 +#define DR7_LOCAL_BP_MASK 0x55 +#define DR7_MAX_BP 4 +#define DR7_BP_INST 0x0 +#define DR7_DATA_WR 0x1 +#define DR7_IO_RW 0x2 +#define DR7_DATA_RW 0x3 + #define PG_PRESENT_BIT 0 #define PG_RW_BIT 1 -- 1.7.2.5 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] target-i386:make hw_breakpoint_enabled return bool type 2012-12-04 8:11 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] target-i386:define name of breakpoint bit in dr7 liguang @ 2012-12-04 8:11 ` liguang 2012-12-04 10:23 ` Peter Maydell 2012-12-04 8:11 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] target-i386:slightly refactor dr7 related function liguang 2012-12-04 12:49 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] target-i386:define name of breakpoint bit in dr7 Peter Maydell 2 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread From: liguang @ 2012-12-04 8:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: afaerber, ehabkost, imammedo, blauwirbel, jan.kiszka, qemu-devel; +Cc: liguang Signed-off-by: liguang <lig.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> --- target-i386/cpu.h | 4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/target-i386/cpu.h b/target-i386/cpu.h index 9abec3e..8ca25c8 100644 --- a/target-i386/cpu.h +++ b/target-i386/cpu.h @@ -996,9 +996,9 @@ int cpu_x86_handle_mmu_fault(CPUX86State *env, target_ulong addr, #define cpu_handle_mmu_fault cpu_x86_handle_mmu_fault void cpu_x86_set_a20(CPUX86State *env, int a20_state); -static inline int hw_breakpoint_enabled(unsigned long dr7, int index) +static inline bool hw_breakpoint_enabled(unsigned long dr7, int index) { - return (dr7 >> (index * 2)) & 3; + return !!((dr7 >> (index * 2)) & 3); } static inline int hw_breakpoint_type(unsigned long dr7, int index) -- 1.7.2.5 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] target-i386:make hw_breakpoint_enabled return bool type 2012-12-04 8:11 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] target-i386:make hw_breakpoint_enabled return bool type liguang @ 2012-12-04 10:23 ` Peter Maydell 2012-12-04 11:11 ` Jan Kiszka 0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread From: Peter Maydell @ 2012-12-04 10:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: liguang; +Cc: ehabkost, jan.kiszka, qemu-devel, blauwirbel, imammedo, afaerber On 4 December 2012 08:11, liguang <lig.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote: > Signed-off-by: liguang <lig.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> > --- > target-i386/cpu.h | 4 ++-- > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/target-i386/cpu.h b/target-i386/cpu.h > index 9abec3e..8ca25c8 100644 > --- a/target-i386/cpu.h > +++ b/target-i386/cpu.h > @@ -996,9 +996,9 @@ int cpu_x86_handle_mmu_fault(CPUX86State *env, target_ulong addr, > #define cpu_handle_mmu_fault cpu_x86_handle_mmu_fault > void cpu_x86_set_a20(CPUX86State *env, int a20_state); > > -static inline int hw_breakpoint_enabled(unsigned long dr7, int index) > +static inline bool hw_breakpoint_enabled(unsigned long dr7, int index) > { > - return (dr7 >> (index * 2)) & 3; > + return !!((dr7 >> (index * 2)) & 3); > } > > static inline int hw_breakpoint_type(unsigned long dr7, int index) Doesn't this break the use of this function in target-i386/seg_helper.c: if (hw_breakpoint_enabled(env->dr[7], i) == 0x1) { which specifically wants to determine whether the breakpoint is enabled only locally? -- PMM ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] target-i386:make hw_breakpoint_enabled return bool type 2012-12-04 10:23 ` Peter Maydell @ 2012-12-04 11:11 ` Jan Kiszka 2012-12-04 11:26 ` Peter Maydell 0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread From: Jan Kiszka @ 2012-12-04 11:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Peter Maydell Cc: ehabkost@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, blauwirbel@gmail.com, imammedo@redhat.com, afaerber@suse.de, liguang On 2012-12-04 11:23, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 4 December 2012 08:11, liguang <lig.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote: >> Signed-off-by: liguang <lig.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> >> --- >> target-i386/cpu.h | 4 ++-- >> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/target-i386/cpu.h b/target-i386/cpu.h >> index 9abec3e..8ca25c8 100644 >> --- a/target-i386/cpu.h >> +++ b/target-i386/cpu.h >> @@ -996,9 +996,9 @@ int cpu_x86_handle_mmu_fault(CPUX86State *env, target_ulong addr, >> #define cpu_handle_mmu_fault cpu_x86_handle_mmu_fault >> void cpu_x86_set_a20(CPUX86State *env, int a20_state); >> >> -static inline int hw_breakpoint_enabled(unsigned long dr7, int index) >> +static inline bool hw_breakpoint_enabled(unsigned long dr7, int index) >> { >> - return (dr7 >> (index * 2)) & 3; >> + return !!((dr7 >> (index * 2)) & 3); >> } >> >> static inline int hw_breakpoint_type(unsigned long dr7, int index) > > Doesn't this break the use of this function in target-i386/seg_helper.c: > > if (hw_breakpoint_enabled(env->dr[7], i) == 0x1) { > > which specifically wants to determine whether the breakpoint is > enabled only locally? It does. And that also indicates the function is misnamed. Something like hw_breakpoint_state might be better. Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RTC ITP SDP-DE Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] target-i386:make hw_breakpoint_enabled return bool type 2012-12-04 11:11 ` Jan Kiszka @ 2012-12-04 11:26 ` Peter Maydell 2012-12-05 0:51 ` li guang 0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread From: Peter Maydell @ 2012-12-04 11:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jan Kiszka Cc: ehabkost@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, blauwirbel@gmail.com, imammedo@redhat.com, afaerber@suse.de, liguang On 4 December 2012 11:11, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com> wrote: > On 2012-12-04 11:23, Peter Maydell wrote: >> Doesn't this break the use of this function in target-i386/seg_helper.c: >> >> if (hw_breakpoint_enabled(env->dr[7], i) == 0x1) { >> >> which specifically wants to determine whether the breakpoint is >> enabled only locally? > > It does. And that also indicates the function is misnamed. Something > like hw_breakpoint_state might be better. And/or we could just refactor the code in seg_helper.c, which is a nasty mix of direct access to dr[7] and using the hw_breakpoint_* functions. -- PMM ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] target-i386:make hw_breakpoint_enabled return bool type 2012-12-04 11:26 ` Peter Maydell @ 2012-12-05 0:51 ` li guang 2012-12-05 8:53 ` Jan Kiszka 0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread From: li guang @ 2012-12-05 0:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Peter Maydell Cc: ehabkost@redhat.com, Jan Kiszka, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, blauwirbel@gmail.com, imammedo@redhat.com, afaerber@suse.de 在 2012-12-04二的 11:26 +0000,Peter Maydell写道: > On 4 December 2012 11:11, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com> wrote: > > On 2012-12-04 11:23, Peter Maydell wrote: > >> Doesn't this break the use of this function in target-i386/seg_helper.c: > >> > >> if (hw_breakpoint_enabled(env->dr[7], i) == 0x1) { > >> > >> which specifically wants to determine whether the breakpoint is > >> enabled only locally? It was changed to 'if (hw_breakpoint_enabled(env->dr[7], i)) {' in patch 3/3 > > > > It does. And that also indicates the function is misnamed. Something > > like hw_breakpoint_state might be better. > misnamed? I think hw_breakpoint_enabled is ask whether breakpoint ^^^^^^^^ is enabled or not, so it's almost suitable. > And/or we could just refactor the code in seg_helper.c, which is > a nasty mix of direct access to dr[7] and using the hw_breakpoint_* > functions. > > -- PMM -- regards! li guang ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] target-i386:make hw_breakpoint_enabled return bool type 2012-12-05 0:51 ` li guang @ 2012-12-05 8:53 ` Jan Kiszka 2012-12-06 2:08 ` li guang 0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread From: Jan Kiszka @ 2012-12-05 8:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: li guang Cc: Peter Maydell, ehabkost@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, blauwirbel@gmail.com, imammedo@redhat.com, afaerber@suse.de On 2012-12-05 01:51, li guang wrote: > 在 2012-12-04二的 11:26 +0000,Peter Maydell写道: >> On 4 December 2012 11:11, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com> wrote: >>> On 2012-12-04 11:23, Peter Maydell wrote: >>>> Doesn't this break the use of this function in target-i386/seg_helper.c: >>>> >>>> if (hw_breakpoint_enabled(env->dr[7], i) == 0x1) { >>>> >>>> which specifically wants to determine whether the breakpoint is >>>> enabled only locally? > > It was changed to 'if (hw_breakpoint_enabled(env->dr[7], i)) {' > in patch 3/3 Which is broken as it neglects the different types of "enabled". > >>> >>> It does. And that also indicates the function is misnamed. Something >>> like hw_breakpoint_state might be better. >> > > misnamed? I think hw_breakpoint_enabled is ask whether breakpoint > ^^^^^^^^ > is enabled or not, so it's almost suitable. There are two types of enabled breakpoints: task-local and global. The current hw_breakpoint_enabled returns both as a bitmask, and that is causing the confusing and regression in your patches. Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RTC ITP SDP-DE Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] target-i386:make hw_breakpoint_enabled return bool type 2012-12-05 8:53 ` Jan Kiszka @ 2012-12-06 2:08 ` li guang 2012-12-06 2:18 ` li guang 0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread From: li guang @ 2012-12-06 2:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jan Kiszka Cc: Peter Maydell, ehabkost@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, blauwirbel@gmail.com, imammedo@redhat.com, afaerber@suse.de 在 2012-12-05三的 09:53 +0100,Jan Kiszka写道: > On 2012-12-05 01:51, li guang wrote: > > 在 2012-12-04二的 11:26 +0000,Peter Maydell写道: > >> On 4 December 2012 11:11, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com> wrote: > >>> On 2012-12-04 11:23, Peter Maydell wrote: > >>>> Doesn't this break the use of this function in target-i386/seg_helper.c: > >>>> > >>>> if (hw_breakpoint_enabled(env->dr[7], i) == 0x1) { > >>>> > >>>> which specifically wants to determine whether the breakpoint is > >>>> enabled only locally? > > > > It was changed to 'if (hw_breakpoint_enabled(env->dr[7], i)) {' > > in patch 3/3 > > Which is broken as it neglects the different types of "enabled". > > > > >>> > >>> It does. And that also indicates the function is misnamed. Something > >>> like hw_breakpoint_state might be better. > >> > > > > misnamed? I think hw_breakpoint_enabled is ask whether breakpoint > > ^^^^^^^^ > > is enabled or not, so it's almost suitable. > > There are two types of enabled breakpoints: task-local and global. The > current hw_breakpoint_enabled returns both as a bitmask, and that is > causing the confusing and regression in your patches. > It is no doubt that 'hw_breakpoint_enabled' is only check local breakpoint, you know, so, do we really have to handle all the cases since seems there's nowhere uses global breapoints at present? > Jan > -- regards! li guang ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] target-i386:make hw_breakpoint_enabled return bool type 2012-12-06 2:08 ` li guang @ 2012-12-06 2:18 ` li guang 0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread From: li guang @ 2012-12-06 2:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jan Kiszka Cc: Peter Maydell, ehabkost@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, blauwirbel@gmail.com, imammedo@redhat.com, afaerber@suse.de 在 2012-12-06四的 10:08 +0800,li guang写道: > 在 2012-12-05三的 09:53 +0100,Jan Kiszka写道: > > On 2012-12-05 01:51, li guang wrote: > > > 在 2012-12-04二的 11:26 +0000,Peter Maydell写道: > > >> On 4 December 2012 11:11, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com> wrote: > > >>> On 2012-12-04 11:23, Peter Maydell wrote: > > >>>> Doesn't this break the use of this function in target-i386/seg_helper.c: > > >>>> > > >>>> if (hw_breakpoint_enabled(env->dr[7], i) == 0x1) { > > >>>> > > >>>> which specifically wants to determine whether the breakpoint is > > >>>> enabled only locally? > > > > > > It was changed to 'if (hw_breakpoint_enabled(env->dr[7], i)) {' > > > in patch 3/3 > > > > Which is broken as it neglects the different types of "enabled". > > > > > > > >>> > > >>> It does. And that also indicates the function is misnamed. Something > > >>> like hw_breakpoint_state might be better. > > >> > > > > > > misnamed? I think hw_breakpoint_enabled is ask whether breakpoint > > > ^^^^^^^^ > > > is enabled or not, so it's almost suitable. > > > > There are two types of enabled breakpoints: task-local and global. The > > current hw_breakpoint_enabled returns both as a bitmask, and that is > > causing the confusing and regression in your patches. > > > > It is no doubt that 'hw_breakpoint_enabled' is only check local > breakpoint, you know, so, do we really have to handle all the cases > since seems there's nowhere uses global breapoints at present? Oh, you're right, I'll fix it. Thanks! > > > Jan > > > -- regards! li guang ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] target-i386:slightly refactor dr7 related function 2012-12-04 8:11 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] target-i386:define name of breakpoint bit in dr7 liguang 2012-12-04 8:11 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] target-i386:make hw_breakpoint_enabled return bool type liguang @ 2012-12-04 8:11 ` liguang 2012-12-04 18:51 ` Blue Swirl 2012-12-04 12:49 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] target-i386:define name of breakpoint bit in dr7 Peter Maydell 2 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread From: liguang @ 2012-12-04 8:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: afaerber, ehabkost, imammedo, blauwirbel, jan.kiszka, qemu-devel; +Cc: liguang Signed-off-by: liguang <lig.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> --- target-i386/helper.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------- target-i386/machine.c | 2 +- target-i386/misc_helper.c | 4 +- target-i386/seg_helper.c | 6 ++-- 4 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-) diff --git a/target-i386/helper.c b/target-i386/helper.c index bf206cf..28307a1 100644 --- a/target-i386/helper.c +++ b/target-i386/helper.c @@ -966,30 +966,31 @@ hwaddr cpu_get_phys_page_debug(CPUX86State *env, target_ulong addr) void hw_breakpoint_insert(CPUX86State *env, int index) { - int type, err = 0; + int type = 0, err = 0; switch (hw_breakpoint_type(env->dr[7], index)) { - case 0: - if (hw_breakpoint_enabled(env->dr[7], index)) + case DR7_BP_INST: + if (hw_breakpoint_enabled(env->dr[7], index)) { err = cpu_breakpoint_insert(env, env->dr[index], BP_CPU, &env->cpu_breakpoint[index]); + } break; - case 1: + case DR7_DATA_WR: type = BP_CPU | BP_MEM_WRITE; - goto insert_wp; - case 2: - /* No support for I/O watchpoints yet */ - break; - case 3: + case DR7_DATA_RW: type = BP_CPU | BP_MEM_ACCESS; - insert_wp: + case DR7_IO_RW: + /* No support for I/O watchpoints yet */ + break; + } + if (type) { err = cpu_watchpoint_insert(env, env->dr[index], hw_breakpoint_len(env->dr[7], index), type, &env->cpu_watchpoint[index]); - break; } - if (err) + if (err) { env->cpu_breakpoint[index] = NULL; + } } void hw_breakpoint_remove(CPUX86State *env, int index) @@ -997,15 +998,16 @@ void hw_breakpoint_remove(CPUX86State *env, int index) if (!env->cpu_breakpoint[index]) return; switch (hw_breakpoint_type(env->dr[7], index)) { - case 0: - if (hw_breakpoint_enabled(env->dr[7], index)) + case DR7_BP_INST: + if (hw_breakpoint_enabled(env->dr[7], index)) { cpu_breakpoint_remove_by_ref(env, env->cpu_breakpoint[index]); + } break; - case 1: - case 3: + case DR7_DATA_RW: + case DR7_DATA_WR: cpu_watchpoint_remove_by_ref(env, env->cpu_watchpoint[index]); break; - case 2: + case DR7_IO_RW: /* No support for I/O watchpoints yet */ break; } @@ -1014,22 +1016,40 @@ void hw_breakpoint_remove(CPUX86State *env, int index) int check_hw_breakpoints(CPUX86State *env, int force_dr6_update) { target_ulong dr6; - int reg, type; + int index; int hit_enabled = 0; + bool bp_match = false; + bool wp_match = false; dr6 = env->dr[6] & ~0xf; - for (reg = 0; reg < 4; reg++) { - type = hw_breakpoint_type(env->dr[7], reg); - if ((type == 0 && env->dr[reg] == env->eip) || - ((type & 1) && env->cpu_watchpoint[reg] && - (env->cpu_watchpoint[reg]->flags & BP_WATCHPOINT_HIT))) { - dr6 |= 1 << reg; - if (hw_breakpoint_enabled(env->dr[7], reg)) + for (index = 0; index < DR7_MAX_BP; index++) { + switch (hw_breakpoint_type(env->dr[7], index)) { + case DR7_BP_INST: + if (env->dr[index] == env->eip) { + bp_match = true; + } + break; + case DR7_DATA_WR: + case DR7_DATA_RW: + if (env->cpu_watchpoint[index] && + env->cpu_watchpoint[index]->flags & BP_WATCHPOINT_HIT) { + wp_match = true; + } + case DR7_IO_RW: + break; + } + if (bp_match || wp_match) { + dr6 |= 1 << index; + if (hw_breakpoint_enabled(env->dr[7], index)) { hit_enabled = 1; + } + bp_match = false; + wp_match = false; } } if (hit_enabled || force_dr6_update) env->dr[6] = dr6; + return hit_enabled; } diff --git a/target-i386/machine.c b/target-i386/machine.c index 4771508..a4b1a1e 100644 --- a/target-i386/machine.c +++ b/target-i386/machine.c @@ -265,7 +265,7 @@ static int cpu_post_load(void *opaque, int version_id) cpu_breakpoint_remove_all(env, BP_CPU); cpu_watchpoint_remove_all(env, BP_CPU); - for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) + for (i = 0; i < DR7_MAX_BP; i++) hw_breakpoint_insert(env, i); tlb_flush(env, 1); diff --git a/target-i386/misc_helper.c b/target-i386/misc_helper.c index a020379..5ee0863 100644 --- a/target-i386/misc_helper.c +++ b/target-i386/misc_helper.c @@ -197,11 +197,11 @@ void helper_movl_drN_T0(CPUX86State *env, int reg, target_ulong t0) env->dr[reg] = t0; hw_breakpoint_insert(env, reg); } else if (reg == 7) { - for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) { + for (i = 0; i < DR7_MAX_BP; i++) { hw_breakpoint_remove(env, i); } env->dr[7] = t0; - for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) { + for (i = 0; i < DR7_MAX_BP; i++) { hw_breakpoint_insert(env, i); } } else { diff --git a/target-i386/seg_helper.c b/target-i386/seg_helper.c index ff93374..16d489a 100644 --- a/target-i386/seg_helper.c +++ b/target-i386/seg_helper.c @@ -465,9 +465,9 @@ static void switch_tss(CPUX86State *env, int tss_selector, #ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY /* reset local breakpoints */ - if (env->dr[7] & 0x55) { - for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) { - if (hw_breakpoint_enabled(env->dr[7], i) == 0x1) { + if (env->dr[7] & DR7_LOCAL_BP_MASK) { + for (i = 0; i < DR7_MAX_BP; i++) { + if (hw_breakpoint_enabled(env->dr[7], i)) { hw_breakpoint_remove(env, i); } } -- 1.7.2.5 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] target-i386:slightly refactor dr7 related function 2012-12-04 8:11 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] target-i386:slightly refactor dr7 related function liguang @ 2012-12-04 18:51 ` Blue Swirl 2012-12-05 0:56 ` li guang 0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread From: Blue Swirl @ 2012-12-04 18:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: liguang; +Cc: qemu-devel, imammedo, jan.kiszka, afaerber, ehabkost On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 8:11 AM, liguang <lig.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote: > Signed-off-by: liguang <lig.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> > --- > target-i386/helper.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------- > target-i386/machine.c | 2 +- > target-i386/misc_helper.c | 4 +- > target-i386/seg_helper.c | 6 ++-- > 4 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/target-i386/helper.c b/target-i386/helper.c > index bf206cf..28307a1 100644 > --- a/target-i386/helper.c > +++ b/target-i386/helper.c > @@ -966,30 +966,31 @@ hwaddr cpu_get_phys_page_debug(CPUX86State *env, target_ulong addr) > > void hw_breakpoint_insert(CPUX86State *env, int index) > { > - int type, err = 0; > + int type = 0, err = 0; > > switch (hw_breakpoint_type(env->dr[7], index)) { > - case 0: > - if (hw_breakpoint_enabled(env->dr[7], index)) > + case DR7_BP_INST: > + if (hw_breakpoint_enabled(env->dr[7], index)) { > err = cpu_breakpoint_insert(env, env->dr[index], BP_CPU, > &env->cpu_breakpoint[index]); > + } > break; > - case 1: > + case DR7_DATA_WR: > type = BP_CPU | BP_MEM_WRITE; > - goto insert_wp; > - case 2: > - /* No support for I/O watchpoints yet */ > - break; > - case 3: Missing 'break'. > + case DR7_DATA_RW: > type = BP_CPU | BP_MEM_ACCESS; > - insert_wp: > + case DR7_IO_RW: > + /* No support for I/O watchpoints yet */ > + break; > + } > + if (type) { > err = cpu_watchpoint_insert(env, env->dr[index], > hw_breakpoint_len(env->dr[7], index), > type, &env->cpu_watchpoint[index]); > - break; > } > - if (err) > + if (err) { > env->cpu_breakpoint[index] = NULL; > + } > } > > void hw_breakpoint_remove(CPUX86State *env, int index) > @@ -997,15 +998,16 @@ void hw_breakpoint_remove(CPUX86State *env, int index) > if (!env->cpu_breakpoint[index]) > return; > switch (hw_breakpoint_type(env->dr[7], index)) { > - case 0: > - if (hw_breakpoint_enabled(env->dr[7], index)) > + case DR7_BP_INST: > + if (hw_breakpoint_enabled(env->dr[7], index)) { > cpu_breakpoint_remove_by_ref(env, env->cpu_breakpoint[index]); > + } > break; > - case 1: > - case 3: > + case DR7_DATA_RW: > + case DR7_DATA_WR: > cpu_watchpoint_remove_by_ref(env, env->cpu_watchpoint[index]); > break; > - case 2: > + case DR7_IO_RW: > /* No support for I/O watchpoints yet */ > break; > } > @@ -1014,22 +1016,40 @@ void hw_breakpoint_remove(CPUX86State *env, int index) > int check_hw_breakpoints(CPUX86State *env, int force_dr6_update) > { > target_ulong dr6; > - int reg, type; > + int index; > int hit_enabled = 0; > + bool bp_match = false; > + bool wp_match = false; > > dr6 = env->dr[6] & ~0xf; > - for (reg = 0; reg < 4; reg++) { > - type = hw_breakpoint_type(env->dr[7], reg); > - if ((type == 0 && env->dr[reg] == env->eip) || > - ((type & 1) && env->cpu_watchpoint[reg] && > - (env->cpu_watchpoint[reg]->flags & BP_WATCHPOINT_HIT))) { > - dr6 |= 1 << reg; > - if (hw_breakpoint_enabled(env->dr[7], reg)) > + for (index = 0; index < DR7_MAX_BP; index++) { > + switch (hw_breakpoint_type(env->dr[7], index)) { > + case DR7_BP_INST: > + if (env->dr[index] == env->eip) { > + bp_match = true; > + } > + break; > + case DR7_DATA_WR: > + case DR7_DATA_RW: > + if (env->cpu_watchpoint[index] && > + env->cpu_watchpoint[index]->flags & BP_WATCHPOINT_HIT) { > + wp_match = true; > + } Also here. > + case DR7_IO_RW: > + break; > + } > + if (bp_match || wp_match) { > + dr6 |= 1 << index; > + if (hw_breakpoint_enabled(env->dr[7], index)) { > hit_enabled = 1; > + } > + bp_match = false; > + wp_match = false; > } > } > if (hit_enabled || force_dr6_update) > env->dr[6] = dr6; > + > return hit_enabled; > } > > diff --git a/target-i386/machine.c b/target-i386/machine.c > index 4771508..a4b1a1e 100644 > --- a/target-i386/machine.c > +++ b/target-i386/machine.c > @@ -265,7 +265,7 @@ static int cpu_post_load(void *opaque, int version_id) > > cpu_breakpoint_remove_all(env, BP_CPU); > cpu_watchpoint_remove_all(env, BP_CPU); > - for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) > + for (i = 0; i < DR7_MAX_BP; i++) Please add braces and check your patches with checkpatch.pl. > hw_breakpoint_insert(env, i); > > tlb_flush(env, 1); > diff --git a/target-i386/misc_helper.c b/target-i386/misc_helper.c > index a020379..5ee0863 100644 > --- a/target-i386/misc_helper.c > +++ b/target-i386/misc_helper.c > @@ -197,11 +197,11 @@ void helper_movl_drN_T0(CPUX86State *env, int reg, target_ulong t0) > env->dr[reg] = t0; > hw_breakpoint_insert(env, reg); > } else if (reg == 7) { > - for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) { > + for (i = 0; i < DR7_MAX_BP; i++) { > hw_breakpoint_remove(env, i); > } > env->dr[7] = t0; > - for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) { > + for (i = 0; i < DR7_MAX_BP; i++) { > hw_breakpoint_insert(env, i); > } > } else { > diff --git a/target-i386/seg_helper.c b/target-i386/seg_helper.c > index ff93374..16d489a 100644 > --- a/target-i386/seg_helper.c > +++ b/target-i386/seg_helper.c > @@ -465,9 +465,9 @@ static void switch_tss(CPUX86State *env, int tss_selector, > > #ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY > /* reset local breakpoints */ > - if (env->dr[7] & 0x55) { > - for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) { > - if (hw_breakpoint_enabled(env->dr[7], i) == 0x1) { > + if (env->dr[7] & DR7_LOCAL_BP_MASK) { > + for (i = 0; i < DR7_MAX_BP; i++) { > + if (hw_breakpoint_enabled(env->dr[7], i)) { > hw_breakpoint_remove(env, i); > } > } > -- > 1.7.2.5 > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] target-i386:slightly refactor dr7 related function 2012-12-04 18:51 ` Blue Swirl @ 2012-12-05 0:56 ` li guang 2012-12-05 8:55 ` Jan Kiszka 0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread From: li guang @ 2012-12-05 0:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Blue Swirl; +Cc: imammedo, ehabkost, qemu-devel, afaerber, jan.kiszka 在 2012-12-04二的 18:51 +0000,Blue Swirl写道: > On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 8:11 AM, liguang <lig.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote: > > Signed-off-by: liguang <lig.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> > > --- > > target-i386/helper.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------- > > target-i386/machine.c | 2 +- > > target-i386/misc_helper.c | 4 +- > > target-i386/seg_helper.c | 6 ++-- > > 4 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/target-i386/helper.c b/target-i386/helper.c > > index bf206cf..28307a1 100644 > > --- a/target-i386/helper.c > > +++ b/target-i386/helper.c > > @@ -966,30 +966,31 @@ hwaddr cpu_get_phys_page_debug(CPUX86State *env, target_ulong addr) > > > > void hw_breakpoint_insert(CPUX86State *env, int index) > > { > > - int type, err = 0; > > + int type = 0, err = 0; > > > > switch (hw_breakpoint_type(env->dr[7], index)) { > > - case 0: > > - if (hw_breakpoint_enabled(env->dr[7], index)) > > + case DR7_BP_INST: > > + if (hw_breakpoint_enabled(env->dr[7], index)) { > > err = cpu_breakpoint_insert(env, env->dr[index], BP_CPU, > > &env->cpu_breakpoint[index]); > > + } > > break; > > - case 1: > > + case DR7_DATA_WR: > > type = BP_CPU | BP_MEM_WRITE; > > - goto insert_wp; > > - case 2: > > - /* No support for I/O watchpoints yet */ > > - break; > > - case 3: > > Missing 'break'. yes, will fix, thanks! > > > + case DR7_DATA_RW: > > type = BP_CPU | BP_MEM_ACCESS; > > - insert_wp: > > + case DR7_IO_RW: > > + /* No support for I/O watchpoints yet */ > > + break; > > + } > > + if (type) { > > err = cpu_watchpoint_insert(env, env->dr[index], > > hw_breakpoint_len(env->dr[7], index), > > type, &env->cpu_watchpoint[index]); > > - break; > > } > > - if (err) > > + if (err) { > > env->cpu_breakpoint[index] = NULL; > > + } > > } > > > > void hw_breakpoint_remove(CPUX86State *env, int index) > > @@ -997,15 +998,16 @@ void hw_breakpoint_remove(CPUX86State *env, int index) > > if (!env->cpu_breakpoint[index]) > > return; > > switch (hw_breakpoint_type(env->dr[7], index)) { > > - case 0: > > - if (hw_breakpoint_enabled(env->dr[7], index)) > > + case DR7_BP_INST: > > + if (hw_breakpoint_enabled(env->dr[7], index)) { > > cpu_breakpoint_remove_by_ref(env, env->cpu_breakpoint[index]); > > + } > > break; > > - case 1: > > - case 3: > > + case DR7_DATA_RW: > > + case DR7_DATA_WR: > > cpu_watchpoint_remove_by_ref(env, env->cpu_watchpoint[index]); > > break; > > - case 2: > > + case DR7_IO_RW: > > /* No support for I/O watchpoints yet */ > > break; > > } > > @@ -1014,22 +1016,40 @@ void hw_breakpoint_remove(CPUX86State *env, int index) > > int check_hw_breakpoints(CPUX86State *env, int force_dr6_update) > > { > > target_ulong dr6; > > - int reg, type; > > + int index; > > int hit_enabled = 0; > > + bool bp_match = false; > > + bool wp_match = false; > > > > dr6 = env->dr[6] & ~0xf; > > - for (reg = 0; reg < 4; reg++) { > > - type = hw_breakpoint_type(env->dr[7], reg); > > - if ((type == 0 && env->dr[reg] == env->eip) || > > - ((type & 1) && env->cpu_watchpoint[reg] && > > - (env->cpu_watchpoint[reg]->flags & BP_WATCHPOINT_HIT))) { > > - dr6 |= 1 << reg; > > - if (hw_breakpoint_enabled(env->dr[7], reg)) > > + for (index = 0; index < DR7_MAX_BP; index++) { > > + switch (hw_breakpoint_type(env->dr[7], index)) { > > + case DR7_BP_INST: > > + if (env->dr[index] == env->eip) { > > + bp_match = true; > > + } > > + break; > > + case DR7_DATA_WR: > > + case DR7_DATA_RW: > > + if (env->cpu_watchpoint[index] && > > + env->cpu_watchpoint[index]->flags & BP_WATCHPOINT_HIT) { > > + wp_match = true; > > + } > > Also here. > No, just fall through. > > + case DR7_IO_RW: > > + break; > > + } > > + if (bp_match || wp_match) { > > + dr6 |= 1 << index; > > + if (hw_breakpoint_enabled(env->dr[7], index)) { > > hit_enabled = 1; > > + } > > + bp_match = false; > > + wp_match = false; > > } > > } > > if (hit_enabled || force_dr6_update) > > env->dr[6] = dr6; > > + > > return hit_enabled; > > } > > > > diff --git a/target-i386/machine.c b/target-i386/machine.c > > index 4771508..a4b1a1e 100644 > > --- a/target-i386/machine.c > > +++ b/target-i386/machine.c > > @@ -265,7 +265,7 @@ static int cpu_post_load(void *opaque, int version_id) > > > > cpu_breakpoint_remove_all(env, BP_CPU); > > cpu_watchpoint_remove_all(env, BP_CPU); > > - for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) > > + for (i = 0; i < DR7_MAX_BP; i++) > > Please add braces and check your patches with checkpatch.pl. hmm, OK. > > > hw_breakpoint_insert(env, i); > > > > tlb_flush(env, 1); > > diff --git a/target-i386/misc_helper.c b/target-i386/misc_helper.c > > index a020379..5ee0863 100644 > > --- a/target-i386/misc_helper.c > > +++ b/target-i386/misc_helper.c > > @@ -197,11 +197,11 @@ void helper_movl_drN_T0(CPUX86State *env, int reg, target_ulong t0) > > env->dr[reg] = t0; > > hw_breakpoint_insert(env, reg); > > } else if (reg == 7) { > > - for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) { > > + for (i = 0; i < DR7_MAX_BP; i++) { > > hw_breakpoint_remove(env, i); > > } > > env->dr[7] = t0; > > - for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) { > > + for (i = 0; i < DR7_MAX_BP; i++) { > > hw_breakpoint_insert(env, i); > > } > > } else { > > diff --git a/target-i386/seg_helper.c b/target-i386/seg_helper.c > > index ff93374..16d489a 100644 > > --- a/target-i386/seg_helper.c > > +++ b/target-i386/seg_helper.c > > @@ -465,9 +465,9 @@ static void switch_tss(CPUX86State *env, int tss_selector, > > > > #ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY > > /* reset local breakpoints */ > > - if (env->dr[7] & 0x55) { > > - for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) { > > - if (hw_breakpoint_enabled(env->dr[7], i) == 0x1) { > > + if (env->dr[7] & DR7_LOCAL_BP_MASK) { > > + for (i = 0; i < DR7_MAX_BP; i++) { > > + if (hw_breakpoint_enabled(env->dr[7], i)) { > > hw_breakpoint_remove(env, i); > > } > > } > > -- > > 1.7.2.5 > > > -- regards! li guang ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] target-i386:slightly refactor dr7 related function 2012-12-05 0:56 ` li guang @ 2012-12-05 8:55 ` Jan Kiszka 0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread From: Jan Kiszka @ 2012-12-05 8:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: li guang Cc: Blue Swirl, imammedo@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, ehabkost@redhat.com, afaerber@suse.de On 2012-12-05 01:56, li guang wrote: >>> @@ -1014,22 +1016,40 @@ void hw_breakpoint_remove(CPUX86State *env, int index) >>> int check_hw_breakpoints(CPUX86State *env, int force_dr6_update) >>> { >>> target_ulong dr6; >>> - int reg, type; >>> + int index; >>> int hit_enabled = 0; >>> + bool bp_match = false; >>> + bool wp_match = false; >>> >>> dr6 = env->dr[6] & ~0xf; >>> - for (reg = 0; reg < 4; reg++) { >>> - type = hw_breakpoint_type(env->dr[7], reg); >>> - if ((type == 0 && env->dr[reg] == env->eip) || >>> - ((type & 1) && env->cpu_watchpoint[reg] && >>> - (env->cpu_watchpoint[reg]->flags & BP_WATCHPOINT_HIT))) { >>> - dr6 |= 1 << reg; >>> - if (hw_breakpoint_enabled(env->dr[7], reg)) >>> + for (index = 0; index < DR7_MAX_BP; index++) { >>> + switch (hw_breakpoint_type(env->dr[7], index)) { >>> + case DR7_BP_INST: >>> + if (env->dr[index] == env->eip) { >>> + bp_match = true; >>> + } >>> + break; >>> + case DR7_DATA_WR: >>> + case DR7_DATA_RW: >>> + if (env->cpu_watchpoint[index] && >>> + env->cpu_watchpoint[index]->flags & BP_WATCHPOINT_HIT) { >>> + wp_match = true; >>> + } >> >> Also here. >> > > No, just fall through. I told you how to clearly mark such cases. Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RTC ITP SDP-DE Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] target-i386:define name of breakpoint bit in dr7 2012-12-04 8:11 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] target-i386:define name of breakpoint bit in dr7 liguang 2012-12-04 8:11 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] target-i386:make hw_breakpoint_enabled return bool type liguang 2012-12-04 8:11 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] target-i386:slightly refactor dr7 related function liguang @ 2012-12-04 12:49 ` Peter Maydell 2012-12-05 2:07 ` li guang 2 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread From: Peter Maydell @ 2012-12-04 12:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: liguang; +Cc: ehabkost, jan.kiszka, qemu-devel, blauwirbel, imammedo, afaerber On 4 December 2012 08:11, liguang <lig.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote: > Signed-off-by: liguang <lig.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> > --- > target-i386/cpu.h | 7 +++++++ > 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/target-i386/cpu.h b/target-i386/cpu.h > index 90ef1ff..9abec3e 100644 > --- a/target-i386/cpu.h > +++ b/target-i386/cpu.h > @@ -231,6 +231,13 @@ > #define DR7_TYPE_SHIFT 16 > #define DR7_LEN_SHIFT 18 > #define DR7_FIXED_1 0x00000400 > +#define DR7_LOCAL_BP_MASK 0x55 > +#define DR7_MAX_BP 4 > +#define DR7_BP_INST 0x0 > +#define DR7_DATA_WR 0x1 > +#define DR7_IO_RW 0x2 > +#define DR7_DATA_RW 0x3 I still think these last four should be DR7_TYPE_BP_INST etc to indicate that they're values for the TYPE field, not direct specifications of bits in DR7. -- PMM ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] target-i386:define name of breakpoint bit in dr7 2012-12-04 12:49 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] target-i386:define name of breakpoint bit in dr7 Peter Maydell @ 2012-12-05 2:07 ` li guang 0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread From: li guang @ 2012-12-05 2:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Peter Maydell Cc: ehabkost, jan.kiszka, qemu-devel, blauwirbel, imammedo, afaerber 在 2012-12-04二的 12:49 +0000,Peter Maydell写道: > On 4 December 2012 08:11, liguang <lig.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote: > > Signed-off-by: liguang <lig.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> > > --- > > target-i386/cpu.h | 7 +++++++ > > 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/target-i386/cpu.h b/target-i386/cpu.h > > index 90ef1ff..9abec3e 100644 > > --- a/target-i386/cpu.h > > +++ b/target-i386/cpu.h > > @@ -231,6 +231,13 @@ > > #define DR7_TYPE_SHIFT 16 > > #define DR7_LEN_SHIFT 18 > > #define DR7_FIXED_1 0x00000400 > > +#define DR7_LOCAL_BP_MASK 0x55 > > +#define DR7_MAX_BP 4 > > +#define DR7_BP_INST 0x0 > > +#define DR7_DATA_WR 0x1 > > +#define DR7_IO_RW 0x2 > > +#define DR7_DATA_RW 0x3 > > I still think these last four should be DR7_TYPE_BP_INST etc to > indicate that they're values for the TYPE field, not direct > specifications of bits in DR7. hmm, is it necessary? you know, the use of these names is after calling 'hw_breakpoint_type' function, so, it's obvious for dr7's type field. > > -- PMM -- regards! li guang ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] target-i386:define name of breakpoint bit in dr7 @ 2012-12-06 3:03 liguang 2012-12-06 3:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] target-i386:make hw_breakpoint_enabled return bool type liguang 0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread From: liguang @ 2012-12-06 3:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: afaerber, ehabkost, imammedo, blauwirbel, jan.kiszka, qemu-devel; +Cc: liguang Signed-off-by: liguang <lig.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> --- target-i386/cpu.h | 7 +++++++ 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/target-i386/cpu.h b/target-i386/cpu.h index 90ef1ff..29245d1 100644 --- a/target-i386/cpu.h +++ b/target-i386/cpu.h @@ -231,6 +231,13 @@ #define DR7_TYPE_SHIFT 16 #define DR7_LEN_SHIFT 18 #define DR7_FIXED_1 0x00000400 +#define DR7_LOCAL_BP_MASK 0x55 +#define DR7_MAX_BP 4 +#define DR7_TYPE_BP_INST 0x0 +#define DR7_TYPE_DATA_WR 0x1 +#define DR7_TYPE_IO_RW 0x2 +#define DR7_TYPE_DATA_RW 0x3 + #define PG_PRESENT_BIT 0 #define PG_RW_BIT 1 -- 1.7.2.5 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] target-i386:make hw_breakpoint_enabled return bool type 2012-12-06 3:03 liguang @ 2012-12-06 3:03 ` liguang 0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread From: liguang @ 2012-12-06 3:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: afaerber, ehabkost, imammedo, blauwirbel, jan.kiszka, qemu-devel; +Cc: liguang Signed-off-by: liguang <lig.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> --- target-i386/cpu.h | 15 +++++++++++++-- 1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/target-i386/cpu.h b/target-i386/cpu.h index 29245d1..3646128 100644 --- a/target-i386/cpu.h +++ b/target-i386/cpu.h @@ -996,9 +996,20 @@ int cpu_x86_handle_mmu_fault(CPUX86State *env, target_ulong addr, #define cpu_handle_mmu_fault cpu_x86_handle_mmu_fault void cpu_x86_set_a20(CPUX86State *env, int a20_state); -static inline int hw_breakpoint_enabled(unsigned long dr7, int index) +static inline bool hw_local_breakpoint_enabled(unsigned long dr7, int index) { - return (dr7 >> (index * 2)) & 3; + return !!((dr7 >> (index * 2)) & 1); +} + +static inline bool hw_global_breakpoint_enabled(unsigned long dr7, int index) +{ + return !!((dr7 >> (index * 2)) & 2); +} + +static inline bool hw_breakpoint_enabled(unsigned long dr7, int index) +{ + return (hw_global_breakpoint_enabled(dr7, index) || + hw_local_breakpoint_enabled(dr7, index)); } static inline int hw_breakpoint_type(unsigned long dr7, int index) -- 1.7.2.5 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-12-06 3:05 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 16+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2012-12-04 8:11 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] target-i386:define name of breakpoint bit in dr7 liguang 2012-12-04 8:11 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] target-i386:make hw_breakpoint_enabled return bool type liguang 2012-12-04 10:23 ` Peter Maydell 2012-12-04 11:11 ` Jan Kiszka 2012-12-04 11:26 ` Peter Maydell 2012-12-05 0:51 ` li guang 2012-12-05 8:53 ` Jan Kiszka 2012-12-06 2:08 ` li guang 2012-12-06 2:18 ` li guang 2012-12-04 8:11 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] target-i386:slightly refactor dr7 related function liguang 2012-12-04 18:51 ` Blue Swirl 2012-12-05 0:56 ` li guang 2012-12-05 8:55 ` Jan Kiszka 2012-12-04 12:49 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] target-i386:define name of breakpoint bit in dr7 Peter Maydell 2012-12-05 2:07 ` li guang -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below -- 2012-12-06 3:03 liguang 2012-12-06 3:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] target-i386:make hw_breakpoint_enabled return bool type liguang
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).