Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/7] target-alpha: Turn CPU definitions into subclasses

["Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>]

Am 06.12.2012 16:29, schrieb Eduardo Habkost:
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 04:03:59AM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote:
> [...]
>> +static void alpha_cpu_register(const AlphaCPUInfo *info)
>> +{
>> +    TypeInfo type_info = {
>> +        .name = info->name,
>> +        .parent = TYPE_ALPHA_CPU,
>> +        .instance_init = info->initfn,
>> +    };
>> +
>> +    type_register_static(&type_info);
> 
> You should use type_register() instead of type_register_static(), here.

I still don't understand why. (CC'ing Anthony, Paolo, Peter)

The TypeInfo argument is in no way retained inside
qom/object.c:type_register_internal().
Therefore the lifetime of TypeInfo should be completely irrelevant for
the static/non-static decision and the documentation should be fixed IMO.
Is there a reason to do it differently? What would we want to do with
TypeInfo after transfer of its field values to TypeImpl?

FWIW if, as suggested earlier, we don't loop over Alpha CPU models in
favor of a handful of trivial static TypeInfos, it becomes irrelevant
for this patch but I'd still like to understand for the remaining
architectures.

Regards,
Andreas

-- 
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg