From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:48419) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TiEYt-0001OM-5z for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 20:23:10 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TiEYq-0004Eh-6B for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 20:23:07 -0500 Message-ID: <50C68B04.9020902@barfooze.de> Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 02:23:16 +0100 From: John Spencer MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1355122786-29243-1-git-send-email-maillist-qemu@barfooze.de> <1355122786-29243-3-git-send-email-maillist-qemu@barfooze.de> <50C6209F.8060506@weilnetz.de> In-Reply-To: <50C6209F.8060506@weilnetz.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/4] fix implicit declaration of syscall() in linux-user/syscall.c List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Stefan Weil Cc: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 12/10/2012 06:49 PM, Stefan Weil wrote: > Am 10.12.2012 07:59, schrieb John Spencer: >> +#include > > This is a workaround for a missing declaration of function syscall > in musl's unistd.h. See my comment to patch 1 for more information. > thanks for noticing! fixed in musl: http://git.musl-libc.org/cgit/musl/commit/?id=baf246e559e915a78a9703e10d15020c7edee423 how do we proceed with the 2 good patches ? is there anything i have to do to get them merged, now that you put the "Reviewed-by" stamp on them ? Thanks, John Spencer