From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:40286) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TiLwY-0005vx-Mk for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 04:16:08 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TiLwS-0003TD-42 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 04:16:02 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:12449) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TiLwR-0003T4-RQ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 04:15:56 -0500 Message-ID: <50C6F9C7.5010608@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 10:15:51 +0100 From: Gerd Hoffmann MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20121208114601.24292.65396.malonedeb@wampee.canonical.com> <20121210155458.27947.19873.malone@gac.canonical.com> <20121211085711.GC23720@stefanha-thinkpad.muc.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20121211085711.GC23720@stefanha-thinkpad.muc.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Bug 1087974] Re: [regression] vnc tight png produces garbled output List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Stefan Hajnoczi Cc: Bug 1087974 <1087974@bugs.launchpad.net>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 12/11/12 09:57, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 03:54:58PM -0000, Tim Hardeck wrote: >> 47683d669f993308c2b84bed4ce64aafb5d7ced4 is the first bad commit >> commit 47683d669f993308c2b84bed4ce64aafb5d7ced4 >> Author: Gerd Hoffmann >> Date: Thu Oct 11 12:04:33 2012 +0200 >> >> pixman/vnc: remove rgb_prepare_row* functions >> >> Let pixman do it instead. >> >> Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann >> >> :040000 040000 653d58e66bf3a2d8240b2f9176979c44ccd720e1 >> 6b6e367a8522cb58b42ad8f204387a354d3b3d00 M ui >> >> >> Just reverting this particular commit isn't enough thou but it is connected. > > This suggests the conversion to pixman has introduced the bug. Quite possible. I've tested tight via 'vncviewer PreferredEncoding=Tight', but that doesn't force png, so there is a chance for issues I havn't seen. > Tim: can you provide steps to reproduce the bug? That will certainly help fixing. Also: How garbled? Totally messed up? Just colors wrong? Any other visible pattern? cheers, Gerd