From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:36729) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TihpN-0000Ha-2H for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 03:38:10 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TihpG-0007lb-Lp for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 03:38:04 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:46154) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tihh4-0005hT-JW for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 03:29:30 -0500 Message-ID: <50C84060.1090105@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 09:29:20 +0100 From: Gerd Hoffmann MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <3e1838e9.148d6.13b8b801db6.Coremail.luo_brian@126.com> <50C7B64B.1010301@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <50C7B64B.1010301@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=gbk Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Performance of usb tablet over ehci List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Hans de Goede Cc: luo_brian , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Hi, > In the end the problem stays that usb uses a polling model versus the > async interrupt model ps2 uses. If your guest supports usb 3.0 (aka xhci) you can try that. The hardware design allows to not poll in the emulation, which brings down the cpu load even more, should come pretty close to ps/2 mouse levels. cheers, Gerd