qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
	aliguori@us.ibm.com, e.voevodin@samsung.com,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	mark.burton@greensocs.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>,
	stefanha@redhat.com, cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com,
	fred.konrad@greensocs.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v7 7/8] virtio-pci-blk : Switch to new API.
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 18:56:13 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50C8C53D.5080206@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50C8C4A2.7010709@suse.de>

Il 12/12/2012 18:53, Andreas Färber ha scritto:
> Am 12.12.2012 15:25, schrieb Peter Maydell:
>> How will the PCI transport's PCI vendor/device/class IDs be
>> set (a) when a virtio-blk backend is created and separately
>> plugged into a virtio-pci transport (b) for the legacy
>> virtio-pci-blk? [ideally the answer to (b) should be "in the
>> same way as for (a)"]
> 
> The obvious answer would be that PCI properties need to be set on the
> PCI device, not an a VirtioDevice sitting on a virtio-bus.

Yes, but the question is *how*... if there will be no usable "-device
virtio-pci", the value of this refactoring becomes a bit lower...

Paolo

> I.e., with the proposed refactoring we'd have on the virtio-bus:
> 
> - VirtioDevice
>   + VirtioBlockDevice
>   + VirtioSCSIDevice - has-a scsi-bus
>   ...
> 
> In turn that means that every VirtioDevice to be exposed as PCI device
> to the guest needs it own PCIDevice exposing a private virtio-bus.
> 
> - PCIDevice
>   - VirtioPCIDevice - has-a virtio-bus
>     + virtio-blk-pci - has-a VirtioBlockDevice on its virtio-bus
>     + virtio-scsi-pci - has-a VirtioSCSIDevice on its virtio-bus
>     ...
> 
> This also happens to solve most of the migration compatibility pretty
> nicely because the wapping PCI devices would be used almost as before,
> some state may need to be forwarded to the VirtioDevice.
> 
> Finally supplying a public device_initialize() or so would be helpful
> for the latter since VMState cannot cross pointers IIRC. I'll look into
> that part since inlining the old qdev functions cripples my Tegra work.
> 
> Andreas
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2012-12-12 17:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-12-10 16:45 [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v7 0/8] Virtio refactoring fred.konrad
2012-12-10 16:45 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v7 1/8] qdev : add a maximum device allowed field for the bus fred.konrad
2012-12-10 16:45 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v7 2/8] virtio-bus : Introduce virtio-bus fred.konrad
2012-12-10 16:45 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v7 3/8] virtio-pci-bus : Introduce virtio-pci-bus fred.konrad
2012-12-10 16:45 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v7 4/8] virtio-pci : Refactor virtio-pci device fred.konrad
2012-12-10 16:45 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v7 5/8] virtio-device : Refactor virtio-device fred.konrad
2012-12-10 16:45 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v7 6/8] virtio-blk : Add the virtio-blk device fred.konrad
2012-12-11 17:33   ` Peter Maydell
2012-12-10 16:45 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v7 7/8] virtio-pci-blk : Switch to new API fred.konrad
2012-12-11 17:50   ` Peter Maydell
2012-12-13  8:57     ` KONRAD Frédéric
2012-12-12 14:25   ` Peter Maydell
2012-12-12 17:53     ` Andreas Färber
2012-12-12 17:56       ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2012-12-12 17:58       ` Peter Maydell
2012-12-12 18:03         ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-12-12 21:22           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-12-13  9:37             ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-12-13 14:51           ` Anthony Liguori
2012-12-16 16:01             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-12-13  9:24         ` KONRAD Frédéric
2012-12-16 16:41       ` Andreas Färber
2012-12-13  8:24     ` KONRAD Frédéric
2012-12-13 10:56       ` KONRAD Frédéric
2012-12-10 16:45 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v7 8/8] virtio-blk : QOM modifications fred.konrad
2012-12-11 17:32   ` Peter Maydell
2012-12-11 17:52 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v7 0/8] Virtio refactoring Peter Maydell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50C8C53D.5080206@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=afaerber@suse.de \
    --cc=agraf@suse.de \
    --cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=e.voevodin@samsung.com \
    --cc=fred.konrad@greensocs.com \
    --cc=mark.burton@greensocs.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).