From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
aliguori@us.ibm.com, e.voevodin@samsung.com,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
mark.burton@greensocs.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>,
stefanha@redhat.com, cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com,
fred.konrad@greensocs.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v7 7/8] virtio-pci-blk : Switch to new API.
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 18:56:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50C8C53D.5080206@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50C8C4A2.7010709@suse.de>
Il 12/12/2012 18:53, Andreas Färber ha scritto:
> Am 12.12.2012 15:25, schrieb Peter Maydell:
>> How will the PCI transport's PCI vendor/device/class IDs be
>> set (a) when a virtio-blk backend is created and separately
>> plugged into a virtio-pci transport (b) for the legacy
>> virtio-pci-blk? [ideally the answer to (b) should be "in the
>> same way as for (a)"]
>
> The obvious answer would be that PCI properties need to be set on the
> PCI device, not an a VirtioDevice sitting on a virtio-bus.
Yes, but the question is *how*... if there will be no usable "-device
virtio-pci", the value of this refactoring becomes a bit lower...
Paolo
> I.e., with the proposed refactoring we'd have on the virtio-bus:
>
> - VirtioDevice
> + VirtioBlockDevice
> + VirtioSCSIDevice - has-a scsi-bus
> ...
>
> In turn that means that every VirtioDevice to be exposed as PCI device
> to the guest needs it own PCIDevice exposing a private virtio-bus.
>
> - PCIDevice
> - VirtioPCIDevice - has-a virtio-bus
> + virtio-blk-pci - has-a VirtioBlockDevice on its virtio-bus
> + virtio-scsi-pci - has-a VirtioSCSIDevice on its virtio-bus
> ...
>
> This also happens to solve most of the migration compatibility pretty
> nicely because the wapping PCI devices would be used almost as before,
> some state may need to be forwarded to the VirtioDevice.
>
> Finally supplying a public device_initialize() or so would be helpful
> for the latter since VMState cannot cross pointers IIRC. I'll look into
> that part since inlining the old qdev functions cripples my Tegra work.
>
> Andreas
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-12 17:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-10 16:45 [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v7 0/8] Virtio refactoring fred.konrad
2012-12-10 16:45 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v7 1/8] qdev : add a maximum device allowed field for the bus fred.konrad
2012-12-10 16:45 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v7 2/8] virtio-bus : Introduce virtio-bus fred.konrad
2012-12-10 16:45 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v7 3/8] virtio-pci-bus : Introduce virtio-pci-bus fred.konrad
2012-12-10 16:45 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v7 4/8] virtio-pci : Refactor virtio-pci device fred.konrad
2012-12-10 16:45 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v7 5/8] virtio-device : Refactor virtio-device fred.konrad
2012-12-10 16:45 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v7 6/8] virtio-blk : Add the virtio-blk device fred.konrad
2012-12-11 17:33 ` Peter Maydell
2012-12-10 16:45 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v7 7/8] virtio-pci-blk : Switch to new API fred.konrad
2012-12-11 17:50 ` Peter Maydell
2012-12-13 8:57 ` KONRAD Frédéric
2012-12-12 14:25 ` Peter Maydell
2012-12-12 17:53 ` Andreas Färber
2012-12-12 17:56 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2012-12-12 17:58 ` Peter Maydell
2012-12-12 18:03 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-12-12 21:22 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-12-13 9:37 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-12-13 14:51 ` Anthony Liguori
2012-12-16 16:01 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-12-13 9:24 ` KONRAD Frédéric
2012-12-16 16:41 ` Andreas Färber
2012-12-13 8:24 ` KONRAD Frédéric
2012-12-13 10:56 ` KONRAD Frédéric
2012-12-10 16:45 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v7 8/8] virtio-blk : QOM modifications fred.konrad
2012-12-11 17:32 ` Peter Maydell
2012-12-11 17:52 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v7 0/8] Virtio refactoring Peter Maydell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50C8C53D.5080206@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
--cc=e.voevodin@samsung.com \
--cc=fred.konrad@greensocs.com \
--cc=mark.burton@greensocs.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).