From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:59615) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TjA56-0004kr-0y for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 09:48:15 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TjA53-0008Eo-KC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 09:48:11 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:21963) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TjA53-0008Ed-Af for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 09:48:09 -0500 Message-ID: <50C9EAA6.7080309@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 15:48:06 +0100 From: Gerd Hoffmann MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1355143684-16850-1-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com> <1355143684-16850-2-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com> <5EEEC17D-B803-482A-9BD8-9600ABE58EA9@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <5EEEC17D-B803-482A-9BD8-9600ABE58EA9@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] pixman: require 0.16.4 as minimum version List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Alexander Graf Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 12/13/12 15:31, Alexander Graf wrote: > > On 10.12.2012, at 13:48, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > >> Lower the bar a bit. 0.16.4 is known-good, and is shipped by >> debian. Fixes build failures on the debian-based buildbot slaves. > > SLES11 ships 0.16.0 for example. It'd be nice to stay compatible > there. If 0.16.0 is known good we can pick that one. > What exactly is the compatibility bar? The fact that it compiles? > Without the configure check it's compiling just fine on 0.12.0 > (openSUSE 11.1) here. Hmm, /me saw reports of *not* building with 0.12.0, which was the reason to add this in the first place ... confused, Gerd