From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:59202) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TjSBN-0004mO-Mn for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 05:07:58 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TjSBM-000262-IO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 05:07:53 -0500 Received: from e28smtp02.in.ibm.com ([122.248.162.2]:43440) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TjSBL-000250-Tx for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 05:07:52 -0500 Received: from /spool/local by e28smtp02.in.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 15:37:15 +0530 Received: from d28relay03.in.ibm.com (d28relay03.in.ibm.com [9.184.220.60]) by d28dlp03.in.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF2B8125804F for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 15:37:35 +0530 (IST) Received: from d28av05.in.ibm.com (d28av05.in.ibm.com [9.184.220.67]) by d28relay03.in.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id qBEA7fr145285414 for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 15:37:42 +0530 Received: from d28av05.in.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d28av05.in.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id qBEA7gZS010102 for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 21:07:42 +1100 Message-ID: <50CAFA34.9010409@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 18:06:44 +0800 From: Wenchao Xia MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1354256243-8375-1-git-send-email-xiawenc@linux.vnet.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <1354256243-8375-1-git-send-email-xiawenc@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v13 0/7] libqblock qemu block layer library List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: pbonzini@redhat.com Cc: Anthony Liguori , qemu-devel@nongnu.org > v13: > Moved another function into stubs, added xml rule in tests/makefile, little > changes in patch 4, 6, 7. > > Wenchao Xia (7): Hi Paolo, Do you think a rebase of the libqblock is needed? It have been quite a time without comments. -- Best Regards Wenchao Xia