From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:60661) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TjSKZ-0007GK-0T for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 05:17:26 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TjSKX-0004Zf-Po for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 05:17:22 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:42651) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TjSKX-0004ZL-IP for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 05:17:21 -0500 Message-ID: <50CAFCAB.7040109@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 11:17:15 +0100 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1354256243-8375-1-git-send-email-xiawenc@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <50CAFA34.9010409@linux.vnet.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <50CAFA34.9010409@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v13 0/7] libqblock qemu block layer library List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Wenchao Xia Cc: Anthony Liguori , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Il 14/12/2012 11:06, Wenchao Xia ha scritto: > > Hi Paolo, > Do you think a rebase of the libqblock is needed? It have been quite > a time without comments. I was hoping that other people would jump in. :) Paolo