From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:48538) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TjVau-0001Hy-Ia for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 08:46:30 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TjVat-0000Dv-Bw for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 08:46:28 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:59445) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TjVas-0000C8-Ti for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 08:46:27 -0500 Message-ID: <50CB2DAC.7070003@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 14:46:20 +0100 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1379550897.23864274.1355471680686.JavaMail.root@redhat.com> <87k3skhidk.fsf@codemonkey.ws> In-Reply-To: <87k3skhidk.fsf@codemonkey.ws> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] define qemukvm-1.2 machine type List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori Cc: Cole Robinson , Marcelo Tosatti , Eduardo Habkost , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Il 14/12/2012 14:29, Anthony Liguori ha scritto: >> > >> > Yes, that's what I was thinking. The problem is that Fedora did ship a >> > qemu-system-x86_64 binary that disabled the qemu-kvm options (including >> > using TCG by default), but it still had a qemu-kvm-compatible migration >> > format. > Can you be more specific? What's different in the migration format? The amount of VRAM for Cirrus is 16 MB, and the ACPI migration is incompatible with qemu 1.2 (what Marcelo changed for 1.3). Paolo