From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:53186) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TkhXS-0003y0-KS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 15:43:51 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TkhXR-0005jH-AZ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 15:43:50 -0500 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:46300 helo=mx2.suse.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TkhXR-0005jB-42 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 15:43:49 -0500 Message-ID: <50CF83F5.10200@suse.de> Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 21:43:33 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Andreas_F=E4rber?= MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1355760092-18755-1-git-send-email-imammedo@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1355760092-18755-1-git-send-email-imammedo@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/20 v2] x86 CPU cleanup (wave 2) List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Igor Mammedov Cc: Don@CloudSwitch.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, ehabkost@redhat.com Am 17.12.2012 17:01, schrieb Igor Mammedov: > This series is several cleanups, moved out from CPU properties series, > since they do not really depend on CPU properties re-factoring and coul= d > simplify CPU subclasses work as well. The initial cleanups (most of which I had already reviewed) look promising. But some others are working around issues that subclasses solve. And I would like to keep functional changes visible. If we go and explicitly set the vendor everywhere as you suggest, do we even still need the vendor override flag at all? Andreas --=20 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=FCrnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imend=F6rffer; HRB 16746 AG N=FCrnbe= rg