From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41120) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tky84-0000LJ-PO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 09:26:46 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tky82-0004cI-SG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 09:26:44 -0500 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:46835 helo=mx2.suse.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tky82-0004cB-Lh for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 09:26:42 -0500 Message-ID: <50D07D1A.1080204@suse.de> Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 15:26:34 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Andreas_F=E4rber?= MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <50C851EA.9040903@siemens.com> In-Reply-To: <50C851EA.9040903@siemens.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] i2c: Add AT24Cxx EEPROM model List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jan Kiszka Cc: Stefan Weil , qemu-devel , Stefan Hajnoczi Am 12.12.2012 10:44, schrieb Jan Kiszka: > On 2012-11-19 15:24, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> See patches for details. >> >> Jan Kiszka (2): >> i2c: Introduce device address mask >> Add AT24Cxx I2C EEPROM device model >> >> hw/Makefile.objs | 2 +- >> hw/at24.c | 363 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++= +++++++++ >> hw/ds1338.c | 2 +- >> hw/i2c.c | 9 +- >> hw/i2c.h | 3 +- >> hw/lm832x.c | 2 +- >> hw/max7310.c | 2 +- >> hw/pxa2xx.c | 3 +- >> hw/smbus.c | 2 +- >> hw/ssd0303.c | 2 +- >> hw/tmp105.c | 2 +- >> hw/tosa.c | 2 +- >> hw/twl92230.c | 2 +- >> hw/wm8750.c | 2 +- >> hw/z2.c | 2 +- >> 15 files changed, 383 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) >> create mode 100644 hw/at24.c >> >=20 > Ping. Both still apply over latest master, and addressable review > comments are not pending according to my understanding. Hello Jan, did you see my recent proposal of an I2C qtest framework? :) For one I'd be interested in feedback from someone who knows I2C and for another maybe you could follow-up your patch with some test case (I2C master shouldn't matter, I guess). Cheers, Andreas --=20 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=FCrnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imend=F6rffer; HRB 16746 AG N=FCrnbe= rg