From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:44222) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tl6Lc-0008Eg-Ei for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 18:13:18 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tl6Lb-000281-8e for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 18:13:16 -0500 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:34912 helo=mx2.suse.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tl6Lb-00027s-2s for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 18:13:15 -0500 Message-ID: <50D0F880.9080506@suse.de> Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 00:13:04 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Andreas_F=E4rber?= MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1355861053-11460-1-git-send-email-ehabkost@redhat.com> <1355861053-11460-10-git-send-email-ehabkost@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1355861053-11460-10-git-send-email-ehabkost@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 09/20] cpu: introduce cpu_realize() List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Eduardo Habkost Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Am 18.12.2012 21:04, schrieb Eduardo Habkost: > This is just for testing/demonstration purposes. Probably this will be > replaced by the more generic DeviceState realize() method, later. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost Such a function was nack'ed for Object, the reason being that the goal was to set realized =3D true in one central place rather than sprinkling _realize() calls everywhere as done for qdev init. Since CPU is close to becoming a device, I would rather not do this differently for the CPU, but I can truely understand the utility of it in this series... :) Andreas --=20 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=FCrnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imend=F6rffer; HRB 16746 AG N=FCrnbe= rg