From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:57272)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kraxel@redhat.com>) id 1Tla64-0005Ag-IZ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 01:59:13 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kraxel@redhat.com>) id 1Tla63-000329-FQ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 01:59:12 -0500
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:20176)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kraxel@redhat.com>) id 1Tla63-000323-7S
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 01:59:11 -0500
Message-ID: <50D2B739.3090502@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 07:59:05 +0100
From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1355943474.12062.4@snotra>
In-Reply-To: <1355943474.12062.4@snotra>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH] Allow building without graphics support
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Cc: Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>, Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

  Hi,

>> Why do you need this?  Any tools not picked up correctly if you don't
>> set the PATH?  Which ones?
> 
> If I don't set the PATH for configure then I get this:
> ERROR: "powerpc-linux-gnu-gcc" either does not exist or does not work

Any hints in config.log what exactly failed?

>> > ...but then I run into the problem that --extra-cflags and
>> > --extra-ldflags don't get passed into pixman.
>>
>> That should be fixable easily.  Have a patch for that?  If so, please
>> send to the list.  Otherwise I can have a look.
> 
> I don't have a patch for it currently.
> 
>> Why do you need --extra-cflags + --extra-ldflags btw?
> 
> For selecting the multilib variant (e500v2 SPE versus normal floating
> point, and eventually I'll probably use it for 32-bit versus 64-bit as
> well).

Makes sense, ok.

cheers,
  Gerd