From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:37065) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tly2I-0000Nd-HK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 03:32:58 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tly2C-0004JT-A3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 03:32:54 -0500 Received: from mail-we0-f169.google.com ([74.125.82.169]:60187) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tly2C-0004JN-3d for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 03:32:48 -0500 Received: by mail-we0-f169.google.com with SMTP id t49so2059532wey.14 for ; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 00:32:47 -0800 (PST) Sender: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <50D41CFF.1020108@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 09:25:35 +0100 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1356044532-8511-1-git-send-email-quintela@redhat.com> <87ehikmeqj.fsf@codemonkey.ws> In-Reply-To: <87ehikmeqj.fsf@codemonkey.ws> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 00/34] migration thread and queue List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Juan Quintela Il 21/12/2012 01:27, Anthony Liguori ha scritto: > Juan Quintela writes: > >> > Hi >> > >> > Changes for yesterday: >> > - Paolo Acked the series >> > - Rebaso on top of today git (only conflicts were due to header re-shuffle) >> > >> > Please pull. >> > >> > [20121219] >> > >> > This is my queue for migration-thread and patches associated. This >> > integrates review comments & code for Paolo. This is the subset from >> > both approachs that we agreed with. rest of patches need more review >> > and are not here. > This breaks migration. Here's my test case: > > #!/bin/sh > > gzip -d -c lidb.ssmall.img.gz | \ > ~/build/qemu/x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64 -cdrom \ > ~/isos/OCDC-lucid-Test-Drive-20110523_140333.iso -enable-kvm -m 2G \ > -incoming exec:dd > > With lidb.ssmall.img.gz being generated from a 'migrate exec:dd of=...' > from qemu.git just a week or two ago. > > I can't bisect tonight but can attempt to tomorrow. How has this been > tested? > > I'm a little concerned here about the timing. With the Christmas > and New Years holiday we're pretty darn close to soft freeze for 1.4. Come on, we're _a month_ from soft freeze. Paolo